Fourth Geneva Convention: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "torture" to "torture") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
{{ | |||
One of the [[Geneva Conventions]] of 1948, the '''Fourth Geneva Convention''' (or '''GCIV''') relates to the protection of [[civilian]]s during times of war "''in the hands''" of an enemy and under any occupation by a foreign power. Essentially, it defines the rules by which an Occupying Power must deal with the civilian population in an area of which they have taken countrol. It, and other treaties such as the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, also specify what military actions are acceptable against areas containing civilians. | One of the [[Geneva Conventions]] of 1948, the '''Fourth Geneva Convention''' (or '''GCIV''') relates to the protection of [[civilian]]s during times of war "''in the hands''" of an enemy and under any occupation by a foreign power. Essentially, it defines the rules by which an Occupying Power must deal with the civilian population in an area of which they have taken countrol. It, and other treaties such as the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, also specify what military actions are acceptable against areas containing civilians. | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 6 April 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||
---|---|---|
One of the Geneva Conventions of 1948, the Fourth Geneva Convention (or GCIV) relates to the protection of civilians during times of war "in the hands" of an enemy and under any occupation by a foreign power. Essentially, it defines the rules by which an Occupying Power must deal with the civilian population in an area of which they have taken countrol. It, and other treaties such as the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, also specify what military actions are acceptable against areas containing civilians. This should not be confused with the better known Third Geneva Convention, which deals with the treatment of prisoners of war. Most of the current controversies about extrajudicial detention and other cases where an individual is moved to a different country are matters covered by the Third Convention. The Fourth Convention, as well as other treaties, principally deal with individuals in their own countries. The convention was published on August 12, 1949, at the end of a conference held in Geneva from April 21 to August 12, 1949. The convention entered into force on October 21, 1950. It has been ratified by 194 countries. There is an Additional Protocol of 1977 that has not been accepted by as many countries. Part I. General ProvisionsThis sets out the overall parameters for GCIV:
Protected person is the most important definition in this section because many of the articles in the rest of GCIV only apply to Protected persons. Article 5 is currently one of the most controversial articles of GCIV, because it forms, (along with Article 5 of the GCIII and parts of GCIV Article 4,) the American Administration's interpretation of unlawful combatants. Part II. General Protection of Populations Against Certain Consequences of WarArticle 13. The provisions of Part II cover the whole of the populations of the countries in conflict, without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race, nationality, religion or political opinion, and are intended to alleviate the sufferings caused by war. Part III. Status and Treatment of Protected PersonsSection I. Provisions common to the territories of the parties to the conflict and to occupied territoriesArticle 32. A protected person/s shall not have anything done to them of such a character as to cause physical suffering or extermination ... the physical suffering or extermination of protected persons in their hands. This prohibition applies not only to murder, torture, corporal punishments, mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment' While the definition of torture may be controversial, the ban on corporal punishment simplifies the matter. Collective punishmentsArticle 33. No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Under the 1949 Geneva Conventions collective punishments are a war crime. Article 33 states: "No protected person may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed," and "collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited." By collective punishment, the drafters of the Geneva Conventions had in mind the reprisal killings of World Wars I and II. In the First World War, Germans executed Belgian villagers in mass retribution for resistance activity. In World War II, Nazis carried out a form of collective punishment to suppress resistance. Entire villages or towns or districts were held responsible for any resistance activity that took place there. The conventions, to counter this, reiterated the principle of individual responsibility. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Commentary to the conventions states that parties to a conflict often would resort to "intimidatory measures to terrorize the population" in hopes of preventing hostile acts, but such practices "strike at guilty and innocent alike. They are opposed to all principles based on humanity and justice."
Right of returnArticle 49. The second paragraph of Article 49 provides that persons displaced during armed conflict must be transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased. This right of displaced persons is often referred to as the "right of return" and has been reaffirmed in later international treaties and conventions. State Practice also establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross. References |