User:George Swan/sandbox/Eugene R. Fidell: Difference between revisions
imported>George Swan (first draft on citizendium) |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "war on terror" to "war on terror") |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Eugene R. Fidell''' (b. | '''Eugene R. Fidell''' (b. March 31, 1945) is an [[United States of America|American]] lawyer and notable expert in [[military law]].<ref name=OfficialBio> | ||
{{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| url=http://www.feldesmantucker.com/Bio/EugeneFidell.asp | | url=http://www.feldesmantucker.com/Bio/EugeneFidell.asp | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Education== | ==Education== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| [[Queens College]] || 1965 | | [[Queens College]] || 1965 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Harvard Law School]] || 1968 | | [[Harvard Law School]] || 1968 | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Current practice== | ==Current practice== | ||
Fidell is a senior partner with [[Feldesman Tucker | Fidell is a senior partner with [[Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell llp]]. He joined the firm in 1984. | ||
He is also asked to serve as a commentator on military law on TV. | He is also asked to serve as a commentator on military law on TV. | ||
Since 2006 he has been an Adjunct Professor at [[Washington College of Law]]. He has been a visiting lecturer at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School. | Since 2006 he has been an Adjunct Professor at [[Washington College of Law]]. He has been a visiting lecturer at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Guantanamo== | ==Guantanamo== | ||
Fidell has been a critic of the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] [[United States President|Presidency]]'s policy on captives taken in the " | Fidell has been a critic of the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] [[United States President|Presidency]]'s policy on captives taken in the "war on terror".<ref name=TheArmyLawyerMilitaryCommissionLaw> | ||
{{cite news | {{cite news | ||
| url=http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/law/mil-commiss-law.pdf | | url=http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/law/mil-commiss-law.pdf | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| publisher=[[Washington Post]] | | publisher=[[Washington Post]] | ||
| author=[[Carol D. Leonnig]] | | author=[[Carol D. Leonnig]] | ||
| date= | | date=March 27 2005 | ||
| accessdate=2008-01-20 | | accessdate=2008-01-20 | ||
}}</ref>: | }}</ref>: | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
"It suggests the procedure is a sham, If a case like that can get through, what it means is that the merest scintilla of evidence against someone would carry the day for the government, even if there's a mountain of evidence on the other side."}} | "It suggests the procedure is a sham, If a case like that can get through, what it means is that the merest scintilla of evidence against someone would carry the day for the government, even if there's a mountain of evidence on the other side."}} | ||
[[Clark Hoyt]], | [[Clark Hoyt]], of the ''[[New York Times]]'' described Fidell holding back in participating in preparing a brief submitted to the Supreme Court on behalf of [[National Institute of Military Justice]] and the [[Bar Association of the District of Columbia]] because of the concern it would be considered a conflict of interest, since his wife journalist [[Linda Greenhouse]] was covering the case.<ref name=NewYorkTimes20080120> | ||
{{cite news | {{cite news | ||
| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/opinion/20pubed.html?ref=opinion&pagewanted=all | | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/opinion/20pubed.html?ref=opinion&pagewanted=all | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| publisher=[[New York Times]] | | publisher=[[New York Times]] | ||
| author=[[Clark Hoyt]] | | author=[[Clark Hoyt]] | ||
| date= | | date=January 20, 2008 | ||
| accessdate=2008-01-18 | | accessdate=2008-01-18 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| publisher=[[Slate magazine]] | | publisher=[[Slate magazine]] | ||
| author=[[Emily Bazelon]], [[Dahlia Lithwick]] | | author=[[Emily Bazelon]], [[Dahlia Lithwick]] | ||
| date=Tuesday, | | date=Tuesday, January 22, 2008 | ||
| accessdate=2008-01-25 | | accessdate=2008-01-25 | ||
| quote= | | quote= | ||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 8 March 2024
This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.
Eugene R. Fidell (b. March 31, 1945) is an American lawyer and notable expert in military law.[1]
Education
| Queens College | 1965 |
| Harvard Law School | 1968 |
Military service
| United States Coast Guard | 1969-1972 |
Current practice
Fidell is a senior partner with Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell llp. He joined the firm in 1984. He is also asked to serve as a commentator on military law on TV. Since 2006 he has been an Adjunct Professor at Washington College of Law. He has been a visiting lecturer at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School.
Guantanamo
Fidell has been a critic of the Bush Presidency's policy on captives taken in the "war on terror".[2]
Commenting on District Court Justice Joyce Hens Green's analysis of the classified dossiers prepared for captive's Combatant Status Review Tribunals Fidell said[3]:
"It suggests the procedure is a sham, If a case like that can get through, what it means is that the merest scintilla of evidence against someone would carry the day for the government, even if there's a mountain of evidence on the other side."
Clark Hoyt, of the New York Times described Fidell holding back in participating in preparing a brief submitted to the Supreme Court on behalf of National Institute of Military Justice and the Bar Association of the District of Columbia because of the concern it would be considered a conflict of interest, since his wife journalist Linda Greenhouse was covering the case.[4]
Slate magazine published an article written by Emily Bazelon and Dahlia Lithwick, criticizing the New York Times for failing to show more support for their employee.[5]
According to Bazelon and Lithwick the main critic of Greenhouse covering stories where her husband Fidell has a role is M. Edward Whelan III of the National Review. They wrote:
Unable to point to any actual bias, Whelan resorts to the petulant claim that the effect of Fidell's involvement in the detainee cases "would be impossible to separate … from the broader political bias that pervades so much of Greenhouse's reporting."
Publications
- Eugene R. Fidell (2002). "Evolving Military Justice,". Naval Institute Press.
- Eugene R. Fidell (2006). "Guide to the Rules of Practice and Procedure for the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces".
- Eugene R. Fidell (2002). "Annotated Guide: Procedures for Trials by Military Commissions of Certain Non-United States Citizens in the War Against Terrorism". LexisNexis.
- Eugene R. Fidell (2003-04). "Military Commission Instructions Sourcebooks". LexisNexis.
- Eugene R. Fidell, Elizabeth L. Hillman, Dwight H. Sullivan (2007). "Military Justice: Cases and Materials". LexisNexis.
References
- ↑ Eugene R. Fidell. Feldesman Tucker Liefer Fidell llp. Retrieved on 2007-11-19.
- ↑ Eugene R. Fidell, Dwight H. Sullivan, Detlev F. Vagts. Military Commission Law, The Army Lawyer, December 2005. Retrieved on 2007-11-10.
- ↑ Carol D. Leonnig. Panel Ignored Evidence on Detainee, Washington Post, March 27 2005, pp. A01. Retrieved on 2008-01-20.
- ↑ Clark Hoyt. Public and Private Lives, Intersecting, New York Times, January 20, 2008. Retrieved on 2008-01-18.
- ↑ Emily Bazelon, Dahlia Lithwick. Lay Off Linda: Why doesn't the New York Times stand up for Linda Greenhouse?, Slate magazine, Tuesday, January 22, 2008. Retrieved on 2008-01-25. “Whelan didn't point to any concrete problem with Greenhouse's handling of these cases. That should be easier to do than with almost any other reporter, given that Greenhouse relies primarily on court filings and oral arguments that are publicly available in their entirety, as Yale law professor Judith Resnik points out to us. Unable to point to any actual bias, Whelan resorts to the petulant claim that the effect of Fidell's involvement in the detainee cases 'would be impossible to separate … from the broader political bias that pervades so much of Greenhouse's reporting.'”