Talk:Playboy magazine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
({{subpages}})
 
(→‎Provenance: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Provenance ==
In [https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Playboy_magazine&diff=917975&oldid=917974 this edit] I copied three references, and a sentence fragment, that listed authors who wrote for Playboy.
[[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] says lists of facts are not eligible for copyright protection.  References are just lists of facts, lacking the creative element required for copyright protection.
Similarly a list of authors is a list of facts, lacking the creative spark required for copyright protection.  [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 07:08, 13 February 2024 (CST)

Latest revision as of 07:08, 13 February 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Literature [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.


Metadata here


Provenance

In this edit I copied three references, and a sentence fragment, that listed authors who wrote for Playboy.

Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service says lists of facts are not eligible for copyright protection. References are just lists of facts, lacking the creative element required for copyright protection.

Similarly a list of authors is a list of facts, lacking the creative spark required for copyright protection. George Swan (talk) 07:08, 13 February 2024 (CST)