Talk:Macrobiotics: Difference between revisions
imported>Pat Palmer (Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm) |
imported>Pat Palmer (wading into the fray) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Wading into the fray == | |||
As a movement, macrobiotics has suffered from a certain lack of consistency and a perhaps too broad definition. In the past, some counselors, and followers who became essentially zealots, have made extravagant claims and practiced macrobiotics too restrictively, in ways that caused the potentially really helpful aspects of macrobiotics to become discounted by mainstream sources. | |||
The Wikipedia article is a travesty of the truth; it is controlled by an aggressive troll who has dismissed macrobiotics as a "fad diet" and is determined to prevent any other representation about the movement. Here, I hope to provide a more balanced representation. I ought to know--over thirty years, I've read all the macrobiotic sources, undergone the training (or "indoctrination" as some would say), and enough time has gone by for me to begin to view it all with an unjaundiced eye. There is a lot of good there, and there are some cautionary tales. I'll appreciate help from you others to keep this neutral and supported by appropriate sources.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 00:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:38, 6 December 2020
Wading into the fray
As a movement, macrobiotics has suffered from a certain lack of consistency and a perhaps too broad definition. In the past, some counselors, and followers who became essentially zealots, have made extravagant claims and practiced macrobiotics too restrictively, in ways that caused the potentially really helpful aspects of macrobiotics to become discounted by mainstream sources.
The Wikipedia article is a travesty of the truth; it is controlled by an aggressive troll who has dismissed macrobiotics as a "fad diet" and is determined to prevent any other representation about the movement. Here, I hope to provide a more balanced representation. I ought to know--over thirty years, I've read all the macrobiotic sources, undergone the training (or "indoctrination" as some would say), and enough time has gone by for me to begin to view it all with an unjaundiced eye. There is a lot of good there, and there are some cautionary tales. I'll appreciate help from you others to keep this neutral and supported by appropriate sources.Pat Palmer (talk) 00:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Food Science Category Check
- History Category Check
- Stub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Food Science Stub Articles
- Food Science Internal Articles
- History Stub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Food Science Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- History tag