Paint, Gold and Blood: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(omitted a couple of words by mistake)
imported>Hayford Peirce
(rewrote the lede sentence)
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Authors|Hayford Peirce|others=y}}
{{Authors|Hayford Peirce|others=y}}


'''Paint, Gold and Blood''' is a 1989 suspense novel by the British mystery and thriller writer [[Michael Gilbert]], published by [[Hodder and Stoughton]] in England by [[Harper & Row]] in the United States. It was Gilbert's 25th novel and....
'''Paint, Gold and Blood''' is a 1989 suspense novel by the British mystery and thriller writer [[Michael Gilbert]], published in England by [[Hodder and Stoughton]] and in the United States by [[Harper & Row]]. It was Gilbert's 25th novel and....


==Plot==
==Plot==

Revision as of 16:22, 12 September 2020

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
(CC) Photo: Jerry Bauer
Michael Gilbert on the back cover of Mr. Calder and Mr. Behrens, 1982
Authors [about]:
Hayford Peirce and others.
CZ is an open collaboration. Please
join in to develop this article!

Paint, Gold and Blood is a 1989 suspense novel by the British mystery and thriller writer Michael Gilbert, published in England by Hodder and Stoughton and in the United States by Harper & Row. It was Gilbert's 25th novel and....

Plot

Unlike many of Gilbert's novels, which have plots within plots and apparently disparate themes that eventually merge together, The Family Tomb is a straightforward suspense story involving only members of the British colony in Florence, a wealthy Etruscan professor who excavates and sells ancient art objects, Italian police and judiciary officials, assorted politicians and lawyers, sympathetic Italian working-class people, and two sinister Mafia figures.


Reception and/or Appraisal

The New York Times and Kirkus Reviews had very different appraisals of it:

The New York Times: [1]

Kirkus Reviews: .[2]

  1. The New York Times, June 21, 1970: [1]
  2. Kirkus Reviews, May 1, 1970: [2]