Paint, Gold and Blood: Difference between revisions
imported>Hayford Peirce (rewrote the lede sentence) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Plot: starting the plot while it's still fresh in my mind) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Plot== | ==Plot== | ||
Unusual for a Gilbert novel, it is difficult to immediately discern its direction. It begins with its youthful protagonist, Peter Dolamore, on a bicycle trip along the north coast of France during the spring break at his boarding school in England. Perfectly bilingual in both French and English as a result of having lived with his French mother in Paris for his first 11 years. He has just spent a uncomfortable few days at the château of a wealthy Englishman who has a vineyard and an extensive art collection in the [[Médoc]] area of [[Bordeaux]]—the Englishman is the uncle of an attractive girl who is a close friend of Peter's at his boarding school and has suggested Peter's visit. | |||
==Reception and/or Appraisal== | ==Reception and/or Appraisal== | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 12 September 2020
Authors [about]:
join in to develop this article! |
Paint, Gold and Blood is a 1989 suspense novel by the British mystery and thriller writer Michael Gilbert, published in England by Hodder and Stoughton and in the United States by Harper & Row. It was Gilbert's 25th novel and....
Plot
Unusual for a Gilbert novel, it is difficult to immediately discern its direction. It begins with its youthful protagonist, Peter Dolamore, on a bicycle trip along the north coast of France during the spring break at his boarding school in England. Perfectly bilingual in both French and English as a result of having lived with his French mother in Paris for his first 11 years. He has just spent a uncomfortable few days at the château of a wealthy Englishman who has a vineyard and an extensive art collection in the Médoc area of Bordeaux—the Englishman is the uncle of an attractive girl who is a close friend of Peter's at his boarding school and has suggested Peter's visit.
Reception and/or Appraisal
The New York Times and Kirkus Reviews had very different appraisals of it:
The New York Times: [1]
Kirkus Reviews: .[2]