Talk:Flash Point (Gilbert novel): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
imported>Hayford Peirce
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== NYT review of Flash Point ==
Just as “Face Me When You Walk Away” is an unflattering picture of Soviet life, so Michael Gilbert's FLASH POINT (Harper & Row, $6.95) examines certain aspects of the British Parliamentary system and does not like what it sees. Gilbert, himself a lawyer, works up a situation where, in an effort to stop a legal case, the British Government steps in and subverts the basic rights of citizens.
Gilbert poses big questions that carry the ethical problems straight up to the Prime Minister. The analogy to certain doings in the United states Government of recent vintage is not once mentioned, but obviously Gilbert had it on his mind. The ending of “Flash Point,” however, is a bit weak. It is as though Gilbert did not know exactly how to resolve the plot, and there is the sudden, unconvincing reversal of character of several key figures. Nevertheless a strong, well‐written book.

Revision as of 15:19, 18 August 2020

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  1974 novel by the British solicitor and thriller writer Michael Gilbert, subtitled in the American edition "A Harper Novel of Law and Lawlessness". [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Literature [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

NYT review of Flash Point

Just as “Face Me When You Walk Away” is an unflattering picture of Soviet life, so Michael Gilbert's FLASH POINT (Harper & Row, $6.95) examines certain aspects of the British Parliamentary system and does not like what it sees. Gilbert, himself a lawyer, works up a situation where, in an effort to stop a legal case, the British Government steps in and subverts the basic rights of citizens.

Gilbert poses big questions that carry the ethical problems straight up to the Prime Minister. The analogy to certain doings in the United states Government of recent vintage is not once mentioned, but obviously Gilbert had it on his mind. The ending of “Flash Point,” however, is a bit weak. It is as though Gilbert did not know exactly how to resolve the plot, and there is the sudden, unconvincing reversal of character of several key figures. Nevertheless a strong, well‐written book.

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Flash_Point_(Gilbert_novel)&oldid=859254"