User talk:Jonathan N Chapple: Difference between revisions
imported>Jonathan N Chapple (→Settlement names: re to Mal) |
imported>Jonathan N Chapple m (→Settlement names: fix reply to M McKee) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:Hi Mal, and thanks for the welcome. A happy new year to you too! | :Hi Mal, and thanks for the welcome. A happy new year to you too! | ||
Looks like you've rumbled me – I've spent too much time over There and not enough time Here, and now I'm unintentionally mimicking T'Other Place. :) I agree that perhaps including both local names makes the intros look a bit unwieldy, and also agree that maybe they'd be better in a separate etymology section (or infobox? Do we have those here?). I presume you included the Gaelic in the intro because "Belfast" is derived from "Beal Feirste" ("mouth of the sand" or something similar, isn't it?); if that's the case, then I think we could be clearer about why that particular language has been deemed suitable for inclusion by stating "derived from Gaelic ''Beal Feirste''..." or something like that. Or we could move both to a separate section. What do you think? | :Looks like you've rumbled me – I've spent too much time over There and not enough time Here, and now I'm unintentionally mimicking T'Other Place. :) I agree that perhaps including both local names makes the intros look a bit unwieldy, and also agree that maybe they'd be better in a separate etymology section (or infobox? Do we have those here?). I presume you included the Gaelic in the intro because "Belfast" is derived from "Beal Feirste" ("mouth of the sand" or something similar, isn't it?); if that's the case, then I think we could be clearer about why that particular language has been deemed suitable for inclusion by stating "derived from Gaelic ''Beal Feirste''..." or something like that. Or we could move both to a separate section. What do you think? | ||
My apologies for just wading in and editing your (very good!) article with reckless abandon – I'm new to all this! [[User:Jonathan N Chapple|Jonathan N Chapple]] 22:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | :My apologies for just wading in and editing your (very good!) article with reckless abandon – I'm new to all this! [[User:Jonathan N Chapple|Jonathan N Chapple]] 22:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:46, 30 December 2011
Welcome!
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at CZ:Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list (do join!) and the blog. Please also join the workgroup mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! D. Matt Innis 01:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Greetings & welcome. Ro Thorpe 15:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks both for the warm welcome. Nice to be here. Jonathan N Chapple 22:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Settlement names
Firstly, hullo and welcome to Citizendium. Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year!
I noticed the changes you made recently to the Belfast and Northern Ireland articles. I wanted to get your thoughts on the subject. Although I created the article here for Belfast and included the Gaelic name in the introduction, I wanted to avoid mimicking The Other Place.
I also though that giving the alternative names in the intro was a bit unwieldy. However, I am very interested in the etymology of place names - I think it's interesting and important and deserves a separate section specifically for such a matter, or the etymology be placed in the intro to a history section. --Mal McKee 19:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Mal, and thanks for the welcome. A happy new year to you too!
- Looks like you've rumbled me – I've spent too much time over There and not enough time Here, and now I'm unintentionally mimicking T'Other Place. :) I agree that perhaps including both local names makes the intros look a bit unwieldy, and also agree that maybe they'd be better in a separate etymology section (or infobox? Do we have those here?). I presume you included the Gaelic in the intro because "Belfast" is derived from "Beal Feirste" ("mouth of the sand" or something similar, isn't it?); if that's the case, then I think we could be clearer about why that particular language has been deemed suitable for inclusion by stating "derived from Gaelic Beal Feirste..." or something like that. Or we could move both to a separate section. What do you think?
- My apologies for just wading in and editing your (very good!) article with reckless abandon – I'm new to all this! Jonathan N Chapple 22:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)