CZ:Managing Editor/2010/007 - Criteria for Editorship: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Statement of problem == | == Statement of problem == | ||
''Please be brief and specific in your request ([[polar question]]s are best) and add relevant links if available. Please state a time frame in which you expect a decision.'' | ''Please be brief and specific in your request ([[polar question]]s are best) and add relevant links if available. Please state a time frame in which you expect a decision.'' | ||
Currently, there are no clear guidelines as to how expertise should be recognized in the framework of the project. These guidelines will have to be issued by the Editorial Council, and a [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=CZ_Talk:Editorial_Council&oldid=100735569#Official_recognition_of_expertise request for them to do so] was made a month ago, yet it has still not entered their formal process. I will thus collect ideas on the matter here and forward them to the EC when they are ready to handle the matter. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 11:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC) | Currently, there are no clear guidelines as to how expertise should be recognized in the framework of the project. These guidelines will have to be issued by the Editorial Council, and a [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=CZ_Talk:Editorial_Council&oldid=100735569#Official_recognition_of_expertise request for them to do so] was made a month ago, yet it has still not entered their formal process. I will thus collect ideas on the matter here and forward them to the EC when they are ready to handle the matter. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 11:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:58, 10 December 2010
| Citizendium Managing Editor | ||
|---|---|---|
| Community input | Pending decisions | Decisions | Referrals | Appeals | Guidelines | External relations |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}
Statement of problem
Please be brief and specific in your request (polar questions are best) and add relevant links if available. Please state a time frame in which you expect a decision.
Currently, there are no clear guidelines as to how expertise should be recognized in the framework of the project. These guidelines will have to be issued by the Editorial Council, and a request for them to do so was made a month ago, yet it has still not entered their formal process. I will thus collect ideas on the matter here and forward them to the EC when they are ready to handle the matter. --Daniel Mietchen 11:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Formal restatement of problem
This section defines the section structure of the decision.
Existing applicable policy
Charter
- Article 14: Editors are Citizens whose expertise in some field of knowledge is recognized and formally acknowledged by the community. Official recognition of expertise — obtained through education or experience — and its scope shall be based on guidelines established by the Editorial Council.
Decisions by the governing bodies
Auxiliary policy
Draft decision
The text below is what I plan to decide in this case. Feel free to edit the text if you think this improves it. If your edits require discussion, please use the dedicated section below. Editing and discussion in this "Draft decision" section shall stop 24h after my last edit to it.'
Discussion of Draft decision
When reading or editing this section, please keep in mind that the current version of the draft decision might be different from the one referred to by previous commenters.