User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Notes: Difference between revisions
< User:Daniel Mietchen | Talks | COASP 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*[http://www.wittylama.com/2009/09/wikipedia-journal/ Wikipedia Journal] | *[http://www.wittylama.com/2009/09/wikipedia-journal/ Wikipedia Journal] | ||
*[http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/WikiSciencePublication WikiSciencePublication] | |||
*[http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/is-a-knol-a-scientific-publishing-platform/#comment-1492 Knol] shares some aspects with wikis and blogs and is already in use for [http://www.ploscurrents.org/ PLoS Currents]. | |||
| Line 35: | Line 39: | ||
*Stresses the re-use part of CC licenses (e.g. for [[Chordoma|images]]) — an aspect of OA publishing that does not receive much attention outside research blogs (cf. [http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/jono/item/toc.html detailed discussion] with respect to the [http://www.aps.org/ American Physical Society], [http://arxiv.org/ arxiv] and [http://www.quantiki.org/ Quantiki], and the [http://rmp.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.101.140001 final outcome: APS authors keep copyright over derivative works]). | *Stresses the re-use part of CC licenses (e.g. for [[Chordoma|images]]) — an aspect of OA publishing that does not receive much attention outside research blogs (cf. [http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/jono/item/toc.html detailed discussion] with respect to the [http://www.aps.org/ American Physical Society], [http://arxiv.org/ arxiv] and [http://www.quantiki.org/ Quantiki], and the [http://rmp.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.101.140001 final outcome: APS authors keep copyright over derivative works]). | ||
==Business models== | ==Business models== | ||
*Main ones: author-pays, (partial) subscription, philanthropy, advertising, premium services | *Main ones: author-pays, (partial) subscription, philanthropy, advertising, premium services | ||
*Not really tried yet: article-specific [http://www.quantiki.org/jobs/feed Job ads] (e.g. via subpages) | *Not really tried yet: article-specific [http://www.quantiki.org/jobs/feed Job ads] (e.g. via subpages) | ||
Revision as of 01:25, 1 June 2010
Background
- For technical reasons, publishing was historically a separate step, performed about once per iteration of the research cycle
- Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, and the remaining hurdles are cultural ones.
Wikis as platforms for science communication
- Wikis can be used, in principle, for any aspect of scholarly communication, as detailed in this comparison of wiki- and paper-based communication systems and the related blog post.
- Examples exist for all steps of the research cycle, except successful applications to major funders (see this overview for some attempts)
Wikis as platforms for scholarly publishing
- Conferences: Stand-alone site / contextualized schedule / contextualized talks and Posters (possibly also as clickable imagemaps, like here)
- Research papers: Accompanied by wiki article, contextualized on-wiki, links to wikis amongst other sources
- Publication lists (incl. supplementary materials and in principle direct links to the raw data)
- built-in article-level metrics at bottom of page and via What links here (which could also be used for other pages, e.g. those hosting images, references, or datasets), author-level metrics via Special:Contributions, further aggregation possible (e.g. at the level of research projects, labs or thematic workgroups)
- Knol shares some aspects with wikis and blogs and is already in use for PLoS Currents.
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing
- The majority of wiki platforms are open access by default, and most variants of wiki software can handle user rights in great detail
- Stresses the re-use part of CC licenses (e.g. for images) — an aspect of OA publishing that does not receive much attention outside research blogs (cf. detailed discussion with respect to the American Physical Society, arxiv and Quantiki, and the final outcome: APS authors keep copyright over derivative works).
Business models
- Main ones: author-pays, (partial) subscription, philanthropy, advertising, premium services
- Not really tried yet: article-specific Job ads (e.g. via subpages)