Talk:Ellipse/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov (→trammel, figs.: new section) |
imported>Paul Wormer |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
4. As for the drawing with a string... I used the loop to draw ellipsi; then the whole ellipse can be drawn at once. (The lenth of the string should be extended with a piece of length equal to the distance betwin the focuses.) <br> | 4. As for the drawing with a string... I used the loop to draw ellipsi; then the whole ellipse can be drawn at once. (The lenth of the string should be extended with a piece of length equal to the distance betwin the focuses.) <br> | ||
[[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 18:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 18:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Dmitri, I'll try to follow your advice on fig. 2 later today. I made it with Autocad and have no code. If you can make a better picture I would appreciate it. Look in an English dictionary for trammel, it is not a person. (I didn't know the word either). We are not allowed to use animated gifs, or using stuff from Wikipedia. Material from WP is only allowed if the real name of the author is known and we have written permission. With regard to the loop: I followed the description and the picture in the book. Boris suggested that I include the picture and I wrote the text to match it. | |||
:I have a question to the mathematicians: two things are missing. The quadric ''Ax''<sup>2</sup>+''Bxy''+''Cy''<sup>2</sup>+''Dx''+''Ey''+''F''=0 and the definition by means of directrices (vertical lines at fixed distance from foci). Is that bad?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 06:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:13, 3 May 2010
Probably this picture could be used: [1] (Fig.207), see [2]. Boris Tsirelson 05:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I added two pictures from that source. Incidentally, feel free to change/adapt/add stuff, CZ is a wiki, you know. --Paul Wormer 12:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
trammel, figs.
1. I have doubts about fig.2; it seems to me that the central line should overlap with the red and the green ellipsi, until their centers.
2. I like the deduction of the Trammel. Who was Trammel? What century, what country did he/she live?
3. How about to borrow the animation of the trammel device grom wikipedia; I mean, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bsgrinder.gif ?
4. As for the drawing with a string... I used the loop to draw ellipsi; then the whole ellipse can be drawn at once. (The lenth of the string should be extended with a piece of length equal to the distance betwin the focuses.)
Dmitrii Kouznetsov 18:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Dmitri, I'll try to follow your advice on fig. 2 later today. I made it with Autocad and have no code. If you can make a better picture I would appreciate it. Look in an English dictionary for trammel, it is not a person. (I didn't know the word either). We are not allowed to use animated gifs, or using stuff from Wikipedia. Material from WP is only allowed if the real name of the author is known and we have written permission. With regard to the loop: I followed the description and the picture in the book. Boris suggested that I include the picture and I wrote the text to match it.
- I have a question to the mathematicians: two things are missing. The quadric Ax2+Bxy+Cy2+Dx+Ey+F=0 and the definition by means of directrices (vertical lines at fixed distance from foci). Is that bad?--Paul Wormer 06:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)