Open Knowledge Conference/Program/A Year in Review: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen (→Notes and comments: pasted in from http://piratepad.net/ep/pad/view/kDyWnVVfrn/rev.3358) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Intro from Rufus Pollock: | Intro from Rufus Pollock: | ||
* Is a not for profit organisation | |||
* OKFN is building on history of other orgs, such as | |||
* Concept of 'open' goes back to Chinese book printing. | |||
* Open is about technology | |||
* Open requires people to declare it, via a license. | |||
* OKFN has ~12 working groups and projects that are then attached to those groups. | |||
* Other OKFN chapters launching = Leipzig launching in May | |||
* if interested in forming your own group contact them (@EvoMRI did) | |||
* "the year open data went mainstream" - data.gov.uk launched in January | |||
* Props to John Sheridan and his political push for open data, e.g. data.gov.uk | |||
* Central Gov't is changing their viewpoint towards open. | |||
* CKAN powers data.gov.uk and is used by 5 other orgs = open catalogue | |||
* "On our way to realising the Debian of Data" | |||
* getting people together to interoperate with data | |||
* most people suck at data - spreadsheets | |||
* [God, I wish the Rewired State people would realise this. CSV dumps is leeches, XML is penicillin, RDF is an MRI scan. -Tom] <-- I like it (me too, but I'm MRI-biased) | |||
* lots of people, not very co-ordinated | |||
* "RDF is very high cost" [any more than writing a SQL schema? An XML format? CSV headers? I don't buy it. It is like the whole thing with type systems - yeah, you can do def foo(x, y) but you have to mentally keep track of the types in your head rather than letting the computer do it for you. -Tom] | |||
* new OKFN WGs: EU, bibliographic information, development, archaeology | |||
* bibliographic information - Swedish and German national libraries now publish linked data | |||
* Exemplars | |||
* Where does my money go <http://www.wheredoesmymoneygo.org/> | |||
* Open Shakespeare <http://www.openshakespeare.org/> | |||
* Kforge | |||
* Public domain works calc | |||
* opendefinition.org | |||
* PantonPriciples | |||
* Open Database Licences | |||
* Oneclickor.gs <http://www.oneclickor.gs/> | |||
* OKFN built demonstrator to show whereealth, education, public, economic affairs, defence, public safety, social protection...etc | |||
* money tracking via data is only skin deep, in the billions, not able to easily track in the millions. | |||
* The 3 S's = Search, Storage and Services | |||
* these three are the infrastratructure for our scoiety | |||
* we are too happy with closed | |||
* /end | |||
* Q&A | |||
* what's going on with open bibliographic data, who owns it? | |||
* OKFN trying to work more with Cambridge and BL to publish bib data. | |||
* What about in other countries? How will it pan out for them? | |||
* UK has been a leader in this area because of political push, i.e. TBL, etc. | |||
* What about the political motivations? | |||
* "Whoever wins will be committed to going down this route" | |||
* Can't put the genie back in the bottle |
Revision as of 06:21, 24 April 2010
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Back to State of the Nation session
Title
A Year in Review
Authors
Keywords
Abstract
Paste abstract in here.
Notes and comments
Intro from Rufus Pollock:
- Is a not for profit organisation
- OKFN is building on history of other orgs, such as
- Concept of 'open' goes back to Chinese book printing.
- Open is about technology
- Open requires people to declare it, via a license.
- OKFN has ~12 working groups and projects that are then attached to those groups.
- Other OKFN chapters launching = Leipzig launching in May
- if interested in forming your own group contact them (@EvoMRI did)
- "the year open data went mainstream" - data.gov.uk launched in January
- Props to John Sheridan and his political push for open data, e.g. data.gov.uk
- Central Gov't is changing their viewpoint towards open.
- CKAN powers data.gov.uk and is used by 5 other orgs = open catalogue
- "On our way to realising the Debian of Data"
- getting people together to interoperate with data
- most people suck at data - spreadsheets
- [God, I wish the Rewired State people would realise this. CSV dumps is leeches, XML is penicillin, RDF is an MRI scan. -Tom] <-- I like it (me too, but I'm MRI-biased)
- lots of people, not very co-ordinated
- "RDF is very high cost" [any more than writing a SQL schema? An XML format? CSV headers? I don't buy it. It is like the whole thing with type systems - yeah, you can do def foo(x, y) but you have to mentally keep track of the types in your head rather than letting the computer do it for you. -Tom]
- new OKFN WGs: EU, bibliographic information, development, archaeology
- bibliographic information - Swedish and German national libraries now publish linked data
- Exemplars
- Where does my money go <http://www.wheredoesmymoneygo.org/>
- Open Shakespeare <http://www.openshakespeare.org/>
- Kforge
- Public domain works calc
- opendefinition.org
- PantonPriciples
- Open Database Licences
- Oneclickor.gs <http://www.oneclickor.gs/>
- OKFN built demonstrator to show whereealth, education, public, economic affairs, defence, public safety, social protection...etc
- money tracking via data is only skin deep, in the billions, not able to easily track in the millions.
- The 3 S's = Search, Storage and Services
- these three are the infrastratructure for our scoiety
- we are too happy with closed
- /end
- Q&A
- what's going on with open bibliographic data, who owns it?
- OKFN trying to work more with Cambridge and BL to publish bib data.
- What about in other countries? How will it pan out for them?
- UK has been a leader in this area because of political push, i.e. TBL, etc.
- What about the political motivations?
- "Whoever wins will be committed to going down this route"
- Can't put the genie back in the bottle