CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
imported>John Stephenson
(template)
 
(52 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[Osteoporosis]]''' ==
{{:{{FeaturedArticleTitle}}}}
----
<small>
As defined by the National Osteoporosis Foundation:
==Footnotes==
{|align="center" style="width:90%;font-size:98%;"
|
<font face="Gill Sans MT">Osteoporosis, or porous bone, is a disease characterized by low bone mass and [microarchitectural] structural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility and an increased susceptibility to fractures, especially of the hip, spine and wrist, although any bone can be affected.</font><ref name=fastfacts>National Osteoporosis Foundation (2005) [https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedschool.creighton.edu%2Ffileadmin%2Fuser%2Fmedicine%2Fimages%2FCreighton_FIRST%2FOsteo_Spotlight%2FFast_Facts.pdf].</ref>
|}
 
The increase in fragility results from both low bone mass and impaired bone quality.
 
Emphasizing the factor of ‘bone strength’, a factor in addition to and distinct from low bone mass, and the consequent increase risk of sustaining a fracture, a [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH) Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy has defined osteoporosis in 2001 as
 
{|align="center" style="width:90%;font-size:98%;"
|
<font face="Gill Sans MT">a skeletal disease characterized by compromised bone strength predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture. Bone strength primarily reflects the integration of bone density and bone quality...</font><ref name=NIH2001> NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. (2001)  [http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.6.785 Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy]. ''JAMA'' 285(6):785-795. PMID 11176917.</ref>
|}
 
Primary osteoporosis can be of two major types: postmenopausal osteoporosis (osteoporosis, postmenopausal) and age-related or senile osteoporosis."
 
Although more common in women, osteoporosis may occur in males.<ref name="pmid18385499">{{cite journal |author=Ebeling PR |title=Clinical practice. Osteoporosis in men |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=358 |issue=14 |pages=1474–82 |year=2008 |month=April |pmid=18385499 |doi=10.1056/NEJMcp0707217 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=18385499&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref>
 
''[[Osteoporosis|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[Osteoporosis#References|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
</small>

Latest revision as of 10:19, 11 September 2020

In computational molecular physics and solid state physics, the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is used to separate the quantum mechanical motion of the electrons from the motion of the nuclei. The method relies on the large mass ratio of electrons and nuclei. For instance the lightest nucleus, the hydrogen nucleus, is already 1836 times heavier than an electron. The method is named after Max Born and Robert Oppenheimer[1], who proposed it in 1927.

Rationale

The computation of the energy and wave function of an average-size molecule is a formidable task that is alleviated by the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation.The BO approximation makes it possible to compute the wave function in two less formidable, consecutive, steps. This approximation was proposed in the early days of quantum mechanics by Born and Oppenheimer (1927) and is indispensable in quantum chemistry and ubiquitous in large parts of computational physics.

In the first step of the BO approximation the electronic Schrödinger equation is solved, yielding a wave function depending on electrons only. For benzene this wave function depends on 126 electronic coordinates. During this solution the nuclei are fixed in a certain configuration, very often the equilibrium configuration. If the effects of the quantum mechanical nuclear motion are to be studied, for instance because a vibrational spectrum is required, this electronic computation must be repeated for many different nuclear configurations. The set of electronic energies thus computed becomes a function of the nuclear coordinates. In the second step of the BO approximation this function serves as a potential in a Schrödinger equation containing only the nuclei—for benzene an equation in 36 variables.

The success of the BO approximation is due to the high ratio between nuclear and electronic masses. The approximation is an important tool of quantum chemistry, without it only the lightest molecule, H2, could be handled; all computations of molecular wave functions for larger molecules make use of it. Even in the cases where the BO approximation breaks down, it is used as a point of departure for the computations.

Historical note

The Born-Oppenheimer approximation is named after M. Born and R. Oppenheimer who wrote a paper [Annalen der Physik, vol. 84, pp. 457-484 (1927)] entitled: Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln (On the Quantum Theory of Molecules). This paper describes the separation of electronic motion, nuclear vibrations, and molecular rotation. A reader of this paper who expects to find clearly delineated the BO approximation—as it is explained above and in most modern textbooks—will be disappointed. The presentation of the BO approximation is well hidden in Taylor expansions (in terms of internal and external nuclear coordinates) of (i) electronic wave functions, (ii) potential energy surfaces and (iii) nuclear kinetic energy terms. Internal coordinates are the relative positions of the nuclei in the molecular equilibrium and their displacements (vibrations) from equilibrium. External coordinates are the position of the center of mass and the orientation of the molecule. The Taylor expansions complicate the theory tremendously and make the derivations very hard to follow. Moreover, knowing that the proper separation of vibrations and rotations was not achieved in this work, but only eight years later [by C. Eckart, Physical Review, vol. 46, pp. 383-387 (1935)] (see Eckart conditions), chemists and molecular physicists are not very much motivated to invest much effort into understanding the work by Born and Oppenheimer, however famous it may be. Although the article still collects many citations each year, it is safe to say that it is not read anymore, except maybe by historians of science.

Footnotes

  1. Wikipedia has an article about Robert Oppenheimer.