CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
imported>John Stephenson
(template)
 
(142 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[Hausdorff dimension]]''' ==
{{:{{FeaturedArticleTitle}}}}
''by  [[User:Melchior Grutzmann|Melchior Grutzmann]] (and [[User:Brandon Piercy|Brandon Piercy]] and [[User:Hendra I. Nurdin|Hendra I. Nurdin]])
<small>
 
==Footnotes==
----
 
In [[mathematics]], the '''Hausdorff dimension''' is a way of defining a possibly fractional exponent for all  figures in a [[metric space]] such that the dimension describes partially the amount to that the set fills the space around it.  For example, a [[plane (geometry)|plane]] would have a Hausdorff dimension of 2, because it fills a 2-parameter subset.  However, it would not make sense to give the [[Sierpiński triangle]] [[fractal]] a dimension of 2, since it does not fully occupy the 2-dimensional realm.  The Hausdorff dimension describes this mathematically by measuring the size of the set.  For self-similar sets there is a relationship to the number of self-similar subsets and their scale.
 
=== Informal definition ===
Intuitively, the dimension of a set is the number of independent parameters one has to pick in order to fix a point.  This is made rigorously with the notion of ''d''-dimensional (topological) [[manifold]] which are particularly regular sets.  The problem with the classical notion is that you can easily break up the digits of a real number to map it bijectively to two (or ''d'') real numbers.  The example of space filling curves shows that it is even possible to do this in a continuous (but non-bijective) way.
 
The notion of Hausdorff dimension refines this notion of dimension such that the dimension can be any non-negative number.
 
Benoît Mandelbrot discovered<ref>B.B. Mandelbrot: ''The fractal geometry of nature'', Freemann '''(1983)''', ISBN 978-0-716-711-865</ref> that many objects in nature are not strictly classical smooth bodies, but best approximated as fractal sets, i.e. subsets of '''R'''<sup>''N''</sup> whose Hausdorff dimension is strictly greater than its topological dimension.
 
 
=== Hausdorff measure and dimension ===
Let ''d'' be a non-negative real number and ''S'' ⊂ ''X'' a subset of a metric space (''X'',''ρ'').  The ''d''-dimesional Hausdorff measure of scale ''δ''>0 is
:<math> H^{d*}_\delta(S) := \inf \{\sum_{i=1}^\infty r_i^d : S\subset\bigcup_{i=1}^\infty B_{r_i}(x_i), r_i\le\delta \}</math>
where B<sub>''r''<sub>''i''</sub>(''x''<sub>''i''</sub>)</sub> is the open ball around ''x''<sub>''i''</sub> ∈ ''X'' of radius ''r''<sub>''i''</sub>.  The ''d''-dimensional Hausdorff measure is now the limit
:<math> H^{d*}(S) := \lim_{\delta\to0+} H^{d*}_\delta(S)</math>.
As in the Carathéodory construction a set  ''S'' ⊂ ''X'' is called ''d''-measurable iff
:<math> H^{d*}(T) = H^{d*}(S\cap T)+ H^{d*}(T\cap X\setminus S)</math> for all  ''T'' ⊂ ''X''.
A set ''S'' ⊂ ''X'' is called Hausdorff measurable if it is H<sup>''d''</sup>-measurable for all ''d''≥0.
 
''[[Hausdorff dimension|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[Hausdorff dimension#Literature|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
</small>

Latest revision as of 09:19, 11 September 2020

After decades of failure to slow the rising global consumption of coal, oil and gas,[1] many countries have proceeded as of 2024 to reconsider nuclear power in order to lower the demand for fossil fuels.[2] Wind and solar power alone, without large-scale storage for these intermittent sources, are unlikely to meet the world's needs for reliable energy.[3][4][5] See Figures 1 and 2 on the magnitude of the world energy challenge.

Nuclear power plants that use nuclear reactors to create electricity could provide the abundant, zero-carbon, dispatchable[6] energy needed for a low-carbon future, but not by simply building more of what we already have. New innovative designs for nuclear reactors are needed to avoid the problems of the past.

(CC) Image: Geoff Russell
Fig.1 Electricity consumption may soon double, mostly from coal-fired power plants in the developing world.[7]

Issues Confronting the Nuclear Industry

New reactor designers have sought to address issues that have prevented the acceptance of nuclear power, including safety, waste management, weapons proliferation, and cost. This article will summarize the questions that have been raised and the criteria that have been established for evaluating these designs. Answers to these questions will be provided by the designers of these reactors in the articles on their designs. Further debate will be provided in the Discussion and the Debate Guide pages of those articles.

Footnotes

  1. Global Energy Growth by Our World In Data
  2. Countries, organizations, and public figures that have reconsidered their stance on nuclear power are listed on the External Links tab of this article.
  3. Pumped storage is currently the most economical way to store electricity, but it requires a large reservoir on a nearby hill or in an abandoned mine. Li-ion battery systems at $500 per KWh are not practical for utility-scale storage. See Energy Storage for a summary of other alternatives.
  4. Utilities that include wind and solar power in their grid must have non-intermittent generating capacity (typically fossil fuels) to handle maximum demand for several days. They can save on fuel, but the cost of the plant is the same with or without intermittent sources.
  5. Mark Jacobson believes that long-distance transmission lines can provide an alternative to costly storage. See the bibliography for more on this proposal and the critique by Christopher Clack.
  6. "Load following" is the term used by utilities, and is important when there is a lot of wind and solar on the grid. Some reactors are not able to do this.
  7. Fig.1.3 in Devanney "Why Nuclear Power has been a Flop"