CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
(→‎Mind-body problem: 2012 doomsday prophecy)
imported>John Stephenson
(template)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[2012 doomsday prophecy]]''' ==
{{:{{FeaturedArticleTitle}}}}
----
<small>
'''2012''' doomsday predictions were irrational fears fueled by certain booksellers, fearmongers, moviemakers and other hucksters to encourage public panic for the purpose of making money. The hoax used dubious claims about [[astronomy]] and ancient Mayan calendars to promote nonsensical predictions regarding apocalyptic events supposed to occur on December 21st or 23rd of 2012. Doomsayers suggested there will be destruction caused by global floods, solar flares, exploding sun, reversals of the magnetic field, or planetary collisions.<ref name=twsMar14g>{{cite news
==Footnotes==
|author= Maria Puente
|title= Oh, Maya! Is 2012 the end? Film boosts doomsday frenzy
|publisher= USA Today
|date= 2009-11-12
|url= http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2009-11-12-2012_CV_N.htm
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14k>{{cite news
|title= Scared Of Planet Nibiru? NASA Would Like To Help
|publisher= NPR
|date= November 15, 2009
|url= http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120436493
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref> Many people are scared.<ref name=twsMar14f>{{cite news
|author=  Brian Handwerk
|title= 2012 Prophecies Sparking Real Fears, Suicide Warnings
|publisher= Huffington Post, National Geographic News
|date= 2009-11-10
|url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/10/2012-prophecies-sparking_n_352296.html
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14m>{{cite news
|author= CHRISTINE BROUWER
|title= Will the World End in 2012?
|publisher= ABC News
|date= July 3, 2008
|url= http://a.abcnews.com/international/story?id=5301284&page=1
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref>
 
Scientists agree 2012 doomsday forecasts are "bunk".<ref name=twsMar14b>{{cite news
|author= Mark Stevenson, Associated Press
|title= Scientists debunk 2012 as doomsday date
|publisher= San Francisco Chronicle
|date= October 11, 2009
|url= http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-10-11/news/17183490_1_meteor-tablet-stone
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14e>{{cite news
|author= DENNIS OVERBYE
|title= Is Doomsday Coming? Perhaps, but Not in 2012 
|publisher= The New York Times
|date= November 16, 2009
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/science/17essay.html
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref>
 
The 2012 doomsday pop culture phenomenon was similar in many respects to the "Y2K" phenomenon which marked New Year's Eve in 1999, when the new millennium happened. The hysteria has also been compared to the panic created by Orson Welles radio program ''War of the Worlds''. But the "2012 apocalypse business is booming", according to the ''Huffington Post''. The 2012 doomsday prediction was one more example of a patten repeated over the centuries; for example, Baptist preacher William Miller convinced perhaps a hundred thousand Americans that the second coming of [[Jesus Christ]] would happen in 1843; it didn't. Doomsday predictions tend to be within the span of about ten years from the present, according to University of Wisconsin historian Paul Boyer, since the sense of "imminence" and that it will "happen soon" is necessary for these hysterias to catch the public imagination.<ref name=twsMar14f/>
[[Image:Planet.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Planet.|Planet "Nibiru" doesn't exist except in the minds of believers of disaster scenarios such as 2012.]]
 
''[[2012 doomsday prophecy|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[2012 doomsday prophecy#References|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
</small>

Latest revision as of 10:19, 11 September 2020

In computational molecular physics and solid state physics, the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is used to separate the quantum mechanical motion of the electrons from the motion of the nuclei. The method relies on the large mass ratio of electrons and nuclei. For instance the lightest nucleus, the hydrogen nucleus, is already 1836 times heavier than an electron. The method is named after Max Born and Robert Oppenheimer[1], who proposed it in 1927.

Rationale

The computation of the energy and wave function of an average-size molecule is a formidable task that is alleviated by the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation.The BO approximation makes it possible to compute the wave function in two less formidable, consecutive, steps. This approximation was proposed in the early days of quantum mechanics by Born and Oppenheimer (1927) and is indispensable in quantum chemistry and ubiquitous in large parts of computational physics.

In the first step of the BO approximation the electronic Schrödinger equation is solved, yielding a wave function depending on electrons only. For benzene this wave function depends on 126 electronic coordinates. During this solution the nuclei are fixed in a certain configuration, very often the equilibrium configuration. If the effects of the quantum mechanical nuclear motion are to be studied, for instance because a vibrational spectrum is required, this electronic computation must be repeated for many different nuclear configurations. The set of electronic energies thus computed becomes a function of the nuclear coordinates. In the second step of the BO approximation this function serves as a potential in a Schrödinger equation containing only the nuclei—for benzene an equation in 36 variables.

The success of the BO approximation is due to the high ratio between nuclear and electronic masses. The approximation is an important tool of quantum chemistry, without it only the lightest molecule, H2, could be handled; all computations of molecular wave functions for larger molecules make use of it. Even in the cases where the BO approximation breaks down, it is used as a point of departure for the computations.

Historical note

The Born-Oppenheimer approximation is named after M. Born and R. Oppenheimer who wrote a paper [Annalen der Physik, vol. 84, pp. 457-484 (1927)] entitled: Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln (On the Quantum Theory of Molecules). This paper describes the separation of electronic motion, nuclear vibrations, and molecular rotation. A reader of this paper who expects to find clearly delineated the BO approximation—as it is explained above and in most modern textbooks—will be disappointed. The presentation of the BO approximation is well hidden in Taylor expansions (in terms of internal and external nuclear coordinates) of (i) electronic wave functions, (ii) potential energy surfaces and (iii) nuclear kinetic energy terms. Internal coordinates are the relative positions of the nuclei in the molecular equilibrium and their displacements (vibrations) from equilibrium. External coordinates are the position of the center of mass and the orientation of the molecule. The Taylor expansions complicate the theory tremendously and make the derivations very hard to follow. Moreover, knowing that the proper separation of vibrations and rotations was not achieved in this work, but only eight years later [by C. Eckart, Physical Review, vol. 46, pp. 383-387 (1935)] (see Eckart conditions), chemists and molecular physicists are not very much motivated to invest much effort into understanding the work by Born and Oppenheimer, however famous it may be. Although the article still collects many citations each year, it is safe to say that it is not read anymore, except maybe by historians of science.

Footnotes

  1. Wikipedia has an article about Robert Oppenheimer.