Talk:Mach effect: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(This is not propulsion related, but specifically explosion related -- it's not exceeding Mach 1.)
 
Line 4: Line 4:


The current introduction and definition read as if explosives were necessary to cause a Mach effect. More conventional propulsion techniques, however, may well suffice. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 23:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The current introduction and definition read as if explosives were necessary to cause a Mach effect. More conventional propulsion techniques, however, may well suffice. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 23:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
:We may need some clarification.  The Mach effect, in this context, very much relates to explosives, and usually nuclear explosives.  There are other things called Mach, such as the speed of sound, and Mach diamonds in extremely fast fluid flows. This Mach effect is specifically concerned with explosive produced shock waves -- at the second level of detail, it becomes more complex due to the double-flash effect of a nuclear burst, which superheats air and changes the speed of propagation through it.
:This isn't about exceeding Mach 1. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:00, 20 April 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  As a result of very large explosions in air, an interaction between the direct shock wave and the shock wave(s) reflected from the ground, which causes combined overpressure on the surface of the earth [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Physics, Engineering and Military [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Nuclear Engineering
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

No need for explosives

The current introduction and definition read as if explosives were necessary to cause a Mach effect. More conventional propulsion techniques, however, may well suffice. --Daniel Mietchen 23:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

We may need some clarification. The Mach effect, in this context, very much relates to explosives, and usually nuclear explosives. There are other things called Mach, such as the speed of sound, and Mach diamonds in extremely fast fluid flows. This Mach effect is specifically concerned with explosive produced shock waves -- at the second level of detail, it becomes more complex due to the double-flash effect of a nuclear burst, which superheats air and changes the speed of propagation through it.
This isn't about exceeding Mach 1. Howard C. Berkowitz 19:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Mach_effect&oldid=737449"