Talk:PageRank/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas Wright Sulcer (did it) |
imported>John Stephenson m (moved Talk:Google Juice to Talk:PageRank/Archive 1: archiving) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
Created.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 12:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | Created.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 12:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
== title == | |||
Shouldn't this be called '''Google juice'''? Although I can see that it can be argued either way. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 02:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Blather == | |||
What the...? Is this serious? Just redirect to PageRank... –[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 08:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Howard appears to be the only active Computer Editor left. I am going to ask him formally to decide whether this is blather or not. I myself have been dubious about it since the start. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 17:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Maybe not complete blather, but with no hard sourcing, it should probably be merged into PageRank, with a redirect. It's fair to say it's a jargon term for SEO. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks, Howard. Who can do the merge? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 17:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:52, 15 November 2013
Created.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 12:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
title
Shouldn't this be called Google juice? Although I can see that it can be argued either way. Hayford Peirce 02:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Blather
What the...? Is this serious? Just redirect to PageRank... –Tom Morris 08:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Howard appears to be the only active Computer Editor left. I am going to ask him formally to decide whether this is blather or not. I myself have been dubious about it since the start. Hayford Peirce 17:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe not complete blather, but with no hard sourcing, it should probably be merged into PageRank, with a redirect. It's fair to say it's a jargon term for SEO. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Howard. Who can do the merge? Hayford Peirce 17:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)