CZ:Charter/Things to address: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (slight rephrasing) |
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types? | #Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types? | ||
#Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium? | #Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium? | ||
#Rights and responsibilities of each role (authors, editors, E-i-C, constables, etc.) |
Revision as of 08:25, 16 October 2009
Starting this page to place some of the things that we can address, or at least provide a way to address these things, in the charter. This may include things that should be institutionalized but not directly in the charter, which are collected at CZ:Charter drafting/Things to address but not in charter.
- dispute resolution concerning content, behaviour or technical matters
- The judicial process
- Who gets to decide about editorship?
- Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types?
- Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium?
- Rights and responsibilities of each role (authors, editors, E-i-C, constables, etc.)