European ballistic missile defense: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Start for Write-a-Thon; continent of Europe)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Write-a-thon: Continental Europe)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
'''Ballistic missile defense''', in the post-[[Cold War]] era, is increasingly an issue for '''[[Europe]]'''. The primary concern is no longer the Soviet Union, but [[Iran]] and possibly other Middle Eastern actors. While [[Russia]] theoretically is a threat, it is not a likely one.
'''Ballistic missile defense''', in the post-[[Cold War]] era, is increasingly an issue for '''[[Europe]]'''. The primary concern is no longer the Soviet Union, but [[Iran]] and possibly other Middle Eastern actors. While [[Russia]] theoretically is a threat, it is not a likely one.



Revision as of 13:09, 10 October 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Ballistic missile defense, in the post-Cold War era, is increasingly an issue for Europe. The primary concern is no longer the Soviet Union, but Iran and possibly other Middle Eastern actors. While Russia theoretically is a threat, it is not a likely one.

Russsia, however, became indignant over what it saw as U.S. action in its sphere of influence, when the George W. Bush Administration proposed placing Ground-Based Midcourse Interceptors in Poland. While much mass media coverage portrayed this as a shield against attacks against Eastern Europe, the particular technology proposed actually was optimized for protecting the East coast of the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles.

On 17 September 2009, the Obama administration withdrew the earlier proposal, in part because it could not be implemented for several years, and really did not address the short-term Iranian threat of intermediate-range ballistic missiles. An alternative approach can be deployed in a year, at lower cost. It has been proposed that the system be implemented as a European multilateral defense, rather than bilateral agreements with the U.S.

Review of threats

Type Range Examples
medium range ballistic missile

(MRBM)

800-2,399 km

500-1499 mi

Iranian Shahab-3

Israeli Jericho II
U.S. PGM-19 Jupiter Soviet SS-4 SANDAL

intermediate range ballistic missile

(IRBM)

1,400-5,499 km

1,500-3,437 mi

Soviet SS-5 SKEAN,

Chinese DF-4, U.S. PGM-17 Thor

intercontinental ballistic missile

(ICBM)

+ 5,500 km

+ 3,438 mi

Chinese DF-5,

Russian RT-2 and RSM-52§,
U.S. LGM-30 Minuteman and UGM-133 Trident D5§

§submarine launched

Point of launch Point of impact Range
Teheran Warsaw 3020 kilometers

1876 miles

London 4408 kilometers

2739 miles

Washington, DC 10,201 kilometers

6339 miles


.