Talk:Colon (punctuation): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Ro Thorpe m (Talk:Colon (punctuation mark) moved to Talk:Colon (punctuation): simpler) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
I'm starting this from scratch. Please leave any ideas/suggestions here. Obrigadissimo. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 01:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
I've been hesitating over this for some time & I've already said something I disagree with... [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 02:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Written utterance == | |||
Oxford says it can be, providing we are talking (Ling.), which is a relief, because 'phrase' is so vague. Bienvenu. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 02:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Yeah, I know, but "syntactical structure" seemed overly pedantic somehow, hehe.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 02:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:37, 21 March 2009
I'm starting this from scratch. Please leave any ideas/suggestions here. Obrigadissimo. Ro Thorpe 01:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I've been hesitating over this for some time & I've already said something I disagree with... Ro Thorpe 02:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Written utterance
Oxford says it can be, providing we are talking (Ling.), which is a relief, because 'phrase' is so vague. Bienvenu. Ro Thorpe 02:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know, but "syntactical structure" seemed overly pedantic somehow, hehe.... Hayford Peirce 02:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)