Tonkin: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: '''Tonkin''' is the northernmost of the three principal regions, from French Indochina, which made up what was to become Vietnam. Its key feature is the Red River Delta.)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
'''Tonkin''' is the northernmost of the three principal regions, from French Indochina, which made up what was to become [[Vietnam]]. Its key feature is the Red River Delta.
'''Tonkin''' is the northernmost of the three principal regions, from French Indochina, which made up what was to become [[Vietnam]]. Its key feature is the Red River Delta.
==Popular stereotypes==
Pike sees northerners as thinking of themselves as modern, rational, efficient, and industrious. To him, southerners of [[Cochin China]] are rustics and [[Annam|Annamites]] from the center as traditionalists, stuck in the past, and focused on intrigue rather than achievement. <ref name=Pike-WPVC>{{citation
| first = Douglas | last = Pike
| title = War, Peace and the Viet Cong
| publisher = MIT Press
| year = 1969}}, p.54 </ref>
==References==
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 21:52, 2 February 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Tonkin is the northernmost of the three principal regions, from French Indochina, which made up what was to become Vietnam. Its key feature is the Red River Delta.

Popular stereotypes

Pike sees northerners as thinking of themselves as modern, rational, efficient, and industrious. To him, southerners of Cochin China are rustics and Annamites from the center as traditionalists, stuck in the past, and focused on intrigue rather than achievement. [1]

References

  1. Pike, Douglas (1969), War, Peace and the Viet Cong, MIT Press, p.54