Talk:Category theory/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Lyall Easthope m (Question about examples.) |
imported>Peter Lyall Easthope m (→Examples: Restated to improve clarity.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Examples == | == Examples == | ||
Jitse, | Jitse & others, | ||
I notice that under Examples we now have "Category of sets" and "Set". | I notice that under Examples we now have "Category of sets" and "Set". | ||
<b>Set</b>, in boldface, is a name for the Category of sets. On the | |||
should be | other hand, not every set is a category. So the first two items should | ||
Likewise for "Category of schemes" and "Scheme". | properly be stated as one example of a category. Likewise for "Category | ||
of schemes" and "Scheme". The list of examples needs tidying.<br> | |||
Regards, ... [[User:Peter Lyall Easthope|Peter Lyall Easthope]] 19:02, 1 September 2008 (CDT) | Regards, ... [[User:Peter Lyall Easthope|Peter Lyall Easthope]] 19:02, 1 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:54, 20 September 2008
Examples
Jitse & others,
I notice that under Examples we now have "Category of sets" and "Set".
Set, in boldface, is a name for the Category of sets. On the
other hand, not every set is a category. So the first two items should
properly be stated as one example of a category. Likewise for "Category
of schemes" and "Scheme". The list of examples needs tidying.
Regards, ... Peter Lyall Easthope 19:02, 1 September 2008 (CDT)