Talk:L. Ron Hubbard: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tom Morris (→Internally-facing: new section) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Internally-facing: glad the changes are OK) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
One often talks about an 'internally-facing' website or service, as in a website that is only available inside a company, as distinct from the 'externally-facing' site. I tend to use this construction as I always found all the 'intranet', 'extranet' stuff to be horrifyingly ugly buzzwords. It seemed appropriate, but the rewrite is an improvement. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 03:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | One often talks about an 'internally-facing' website or service, as in a website that is only available inside a company, as distinct from the 'externally-facing' site. I tend to use this construction as I always found all the 'intranet', 'extranet' stuff to be horrifyingly ugly buzzwords. It seemed appropriate, but the rewrite is an improvement. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 03:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I'm sure it exists, but I had never hear of it before. Did a google, and nothing turned up using it that seemed to fall within "real" writing, hehe.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:32, 4 January 2009
Internally-facing
One often talks about an 'internally-facing' website or service, as in a website that is only available inside a company, as distinct from the 'externally-facing' site. I tend to use this construction as I always found all the 'intranet', 'extranet' stuff to be horrifyingly ugly buzzwords. It seemed appropriate, but the rewrite is an improvement. --Tom Morris 03:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sure it exists, but I had never hear of it before. Did a google, and nothing turned up using it that seemed to fall within "real" writing, hehe.... Hayford Peirce 03:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)