Talk:Computer networking internetwork protocols: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}} ==This is very, very stubby== Noel, my initial thought is to have IPv4/IPv6 here, as well as routing protocols, ARP of various sorts, discovery ala IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, IC...) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Singular?: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==This is very, very stubby== | ==This is very, very stubby== | ||
Noel, my initial thought is to have IPv4/IPv6 here, as well as routing protocols, ARP of various sorts, discovery ala IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, ICMP, and maybe DHCP. This would be a good time to consider your ideas about a shim below internetwork. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:27, 17 May 2008 (CDT) | Noel, my initial thought is to have IPv4/IPv6 here, as well as routing protocols, ARP of various sorts, discovery ala IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, ICMP, and maybe DHCP. This would be a good time to consider your ideas about a shim below internetwork. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:27, 17 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
== Singular? == | |||
If there is no special reason for the plural ("protocols") this should be moved to "...protocol". [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 20:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:04, 9 December 2009
|
| Metadata here |
This is very, very stubby
Noel, my initial thought is to have IPv4/IPv6 here, as well as routing protocols, ARP of various sorts, discovery ala IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, ICMP, and maybe DHCP. This would be a good time to consider your ideas about a shim below internetwork. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:27, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
Singular?
If there is no special reason for the plural ("protocols") this should be moved to "...protocol". Peter Schmitt 20:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)