Talk:Archive:Workgroup Weeks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King (→Eduzendium: new section) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I think we should probably be approaching departments or department heads to see if they're interested in the program. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | I think we should probably be approaching departments or department heads to see if they're interested in the program. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Yes, I think that's an excellent idea, and Workgroup Weeks is the perfect time to raise the idea. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:24, 24 April 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 11:24, 24 April 2008
Experts
I already whacked on CZ:Why should experts join CZ? a fair amount, so I have signed up for that. I could use some guidance on what else we need to say there, etc, etc. CZ Talk:Why should experts join CZ? awaits.... J. Noel Chiappa 19:46, 22 April 2008 (CDT)
Will do. --Larry Sanger 13:15, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
Eduzendium
I think we should probably be approaching departments or department heads to see if they're interested in the program. --Robert W King 12:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
Yes, I think that's an excellent idea, and Workgroup Weeks is the perfect time to raise the idea. --Larry Sanger 12:24, 24 April 2008 (CDT)