Talk:Aluminium/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Graham Proud mNo edit summary |
imported>John Stephenson ({{archive box|auto=long}}) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive box|auto=long}} | ||
Why is this still (or again?) not under the official IUPAC name? This was discussed before somewhere. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC) | Why is this still (or again?) not under the official IUPAC name? This was discussed before somewhere. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:14, 16 September 2013
Why is this still (or again?) not under the official IUPAC name? This was discussed before somewhere. Peter Jackson 10:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Would be worthwhile making reference to the flammability of Aluminium, and the implications for naval vessels in warfare - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Sheffield_(D80) --Graham Proud 08:34, 27 April 2011 (CDT)