Talk:Correspondence of Abelard and Heloise: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (I think the lede should be rewritten but I'm too lazy (and ignorant) to do it myself) |
imported>Brian P. Long No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Or so I think -- I could easily be wrong.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 10:49, 17 February 2008 (CST) | Or so I think -- I could easily be wrong.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 10:49, 17 February 2008 (CST) | ||
::Yeah, I appreciate the desire to get the title of the article in the first sentence. (And upon reflection, the title "Letters of Abelard and Heloise" might fit better with CZ naming conventions; if anyone wants to move the page, it's fine by me) If anyone wants to have a go at rewriting the first sentence, that's perfectly alright by me (and I can help with factual stuff). The only thing is that the 'Correspondence of A & H' or 'Letters of A & H' isn't really a technical term, it's just a phrase which refers to this well-known group of letters. Because of that, it seems weird to start the article with an explanation of the phrase, and difficult to fit the title of the article in the first sentence. [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 12:25, 17 February 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 12:25, 17 February 2008
The first sentence should be something like: "The Correspondence of Abelard and Heloise refers to the letters between John-Paul Abelard and his lover Heloise Smith over a period of years in 17th-century Italy...." or whatnot. "They are renowned because...." And so forth.
Or so I think -- I could easily be wrong.... Hayford Peirce 10:49, 17 February 2008 (CST)
- Yeah, I appreciate the desire to get the title of the article in the first sentence. (And upon reflection, the title "Letters of Abelard and Heloise" might fit better with CZ naming conventions; if anyone wants to move the page, it's fine by me) If anyone wants to have a go at rewriting the first sentence, that's perfectly alright by me (and I can help with factual stuff). The only thing is that the 'Correspondence of A & H' or 'Letters of A & H' isn't really a technical term, it's just a phrase which refers to this well-known group of letters. Because of that, it seems weird to start the article with an explanation of the phrase, and difficult to fit the title of the article in the first sentence. Brian P. Long 12:25, 17 February 2008 (CST)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- History Category Check
- Literature Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- History tag