Talk:Biot-Savart law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
imported>Peter Jackson No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
B&S wrote ''réciproque'' because their formula contains a 1/R (not a 1/R²) dependence; see the present article. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 01:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | B&S wrote ''réciproque'' because their formula contains a 1/R (not a 1/R²) dependence; see the present article. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 01:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
==Ungrammatical title== | |||
As apparently B&S are indeed two people, the title is wrong. It should be Biot–Savart Law. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:27, 21 March 2011
B&S wrote réciproque because their formula contains a 1/R (not a 1/R²) dependence; see the present article. --Paul Wormer 01:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Ungrammatical title
As apparently B&S are indeed two people, the title is wrong. It should be Biot–Savart Law. Peter Jackson 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)