Talk:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Anthony Argyriou (→article organization: new section) |
imported>Milton Beychok m (→article organization: Response) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Would it be appropriate to place the "major laws" section above the "organization" section? I would think that most people interested in the EPA would be more interested in what it does, rather than how it is organized. The "major laws" section could be fleshed out with some description of how it enforces those laws, and perhaps some high profile cases; the "organization" section should perhaps refer to the agencies which were consolidated into the EPA, and how their duties were distributed. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 13:16, 31 January 2008 (CST) | Would it be appropriate to place the "major laws" section above the "organization" section? I would think that most people interested in the EPA would be more interested in what it does, rather than how it is organized. The "major laws" section could be fleshed out with some description of how it enforces those laws, and perhaps some high profile cases; the "organization" section should perhaps refer to the agencies which were consolidated into the EPA, and how their duties were distributed. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 13:16, 31 January 2008 (CST) | ||
:I agree that relocating the "major laws" ahead of "organization" is a good idea and will do it immediately. However, fleshing out the two sections will take quite a bit of research ... and I may not get to it for quite some time. Perhaps, some other editors may do some of that. Regards, - [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 14:53, 31 January 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 14:53, 31 January 2008
This article was written from scratch
I wrote this article from scratch without any referring to the Wikipedia article of the same title. If there are any sentences that seem to have come from the Wikipedia article, then they are only coincidences.
I depended completely upon (a) my own 20 years of experience working as a consultant in the environmental protection field and (b) the many online references listed in the article. - Milton Beychok 01:59, 29 January 2008 (CST)
article organization
Would it be appropriate to place the "major laws" section above the "organization" section? I would think that most people interested in the EPA would be more interested in what it does, rather than how it is organized. The "major laws" section could be fleshed out with some description of how it enforces those laws, and perhaps some high profile cases; the "organization" section should perhaps refer to the agencies which were consolidated into the EPA, and how their duties were distributed. Anthony Argyriou 13:16, 31 January 2008 (CST)
- I agree that relocating the "major laws" ahead of "organization" is a good idea and will do it immediately. However, fleshing out the two sections will take quite a bit of research ... and I may not get to it for quite some time. Perhaps, some other editors may do some of that. Regards, - Milton Beychok 14:53, 31 January 2008 (CST)
- Article with Definition
- Nonstub Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Advanced Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag
- Environmental Engineering tag