Talk:Fossilization (language acquisition): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (subpages) |
imported>John Stephenson (→Simple hypothesis: reply) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Simple hypothesis == | |||
Perhaps the simplest explanation for fossilisation is that once the learner can achieve his/her communicative goals in the L2, there is little reason either for him/her to learn more or for others to provide correction and feedback. I'd say the article should at least mention this hypothesis. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 01:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
:The phenomenon really refers to a freeze in progress regardless of what the learner does or doesn't do, and consequent resistance to explicit or implicit correction, as opposed to learners not developing fluency simply because they no longer need to learn more, i.e. it's some sort of psycholinguistic or cognitive effect rather than a consequence of low exposure or need to use the language. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 15:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:41, 7 May 2012
Simple hypothesis
Perhaps the simplest explanation for fossilisation is that once the learner can achieve his/her communicative goals in the L2, there is little reason either for him/her to learn more or for others to provide correction and feedback. I'd say the article should at least mention this hypothesis. Sandy Harris 01:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- The phenomenon really refers to a freeze in progress regardless of what the learner does or doesn't do, and consequent resistance to explicit or implicit correction, as opposed to learners not developing fluency simply because they no longer need to learn more, i.e. it's some sort of psycholinguistic or cognitive effect rather than a consequence of low exposure or need to use the language. John Stephenson 15:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)