Étale morphism: Difference between revisions
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo |
imported>Hayford Peirce (moved Applications to the top to give the general reader at least *some* idea of what this is used for; also moved TOC to upper right) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC-right}} | |||
==Applications== | |||
Deligne proved the [[Weil-Riemann hypothesis]] using étale cohomology. | |||
==The Weil Conjectures== | ==The Weil Conjectures== | ||
Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
<math>0\to F(U_i)\to\prod_i F(U_i)\to \prod_{i,j} F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math> | <math>0\to F(U_i)\to\prod_i F(U_i)\to \prod_{i,j} F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math> | ||
is exact. | is exact. | ||
==<math>l</math>-adic cohomology== | ==<math>l</math>-adic cohomology== |
Revision as of 13:36, 31 December 2007
Applications
Deligne proved the Weil-Riemann hypothesis using étale cohomology.
The Weil Conjectures
Definition
The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes :
- is flat and unramified.
- is flat and the sheaf of Kähler differentials is zero; .
- is smooth of relative dimension 0.
and is said to be étale when this is the case.
The small étale site
The category of étale -schemes becomes a Grothendieck topology, if one defines the sets of coverings to be jointly-surjective collections of -morphisms ; i.e., such that the union of images covers . That this forms a grothendieck essentially follows from the following three facts:
- Open immersions are étale.
- The étale property lifts by base change: that is, if is an étale morphism, and is any morphism, then the canonical fibered projection is again étale.
- If and are such that is étale, then is étale as well.
Étale cohomology
One begins by defining a presheaf to be a contravariant functor from the underlying category of a small étale site into an abelian category . Am étale sheaf (or just sheaf if the étale site is implicit) on is then a presheaf such that for all coverings , the diagram is exact.