Étale morphism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo |
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes <math>f:X\to Y</math>: | The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes <math>f:X\to Y</math>: | ||
#<math>f</math> is [[flat]] and [[unramified]]. | #<math>f</math> is [[Flat morphism|flat]] and [[Unramified morphism|unramified]]. | ||
#<math>f</math> is | #<math>f</math> is flat and the sheaf of [[Kähler differentials]] is zero; <math>\Omega_{X/Y}=0</math>. | ||
#<math>f</math> is [[smooth]] of relative dimension 0. | #<math>f</math> is [[Smooth morphism|smooth]] of relative dimension 0. | ||
==The small étale site== | ==The small étale site== |
Revision as of 06:36, 6 December 2007
The Weil Conjectures
Definition
The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes :
- is flat and unramified.
- is flat and the sheaf of Kähler differentials is zero; .
- is smooth of relative dimension 0.
The small étale site
The category of étale -schemes becomes a Grothendieck topology, if one defines the sets of coverings to be jointly-surjective collections of -morphisms ; i.e., such that the union of images covers . That this forms a grothendieck essentially follows from the following three facts:
- Open immersions are étale.
- The étale property lifts by base change: that is, if is an étale morphism, and is any morphism, then the canonical fibered projection is again étale.
- If and are such that is étale, then is étale as well.
Étale cohomology
One begins by defining a presheaf to be a contravariant functor from the underlying category of a small étale site into an abelian category . A sheaf on is then
Applications
Deligne proved the Weil-Riemann hypothesis using étale cohomology.