Étale morphism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo
Line 5: Line 5:
The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes <math>f:X\to Y</math>:
The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes <math>f:X\to Y</math>:


#<math>f</math> is [[flat]] and [[unramified]].
#<math>f</math> is [[Flat morphism|flat]] and [[Unramified morphism|unramified]].
#<math>f</math> is [[flat]] and the sheaf of [[Kähler differentials]] is zero; <math>\Omega_{X/Y}=0</math>.
#<math>f</math> is flat and the sheaf of [[Kähler differentials]] is zero; <math>\Omega_{X/Y}=0</math>.
#<math>f</math> is [[smooth]] of relative dimension 0.
#<math>f</math> is [[Smooth morphism|smooth]] of relative dimension 0.


==The small étale site==
==The small étale site==

Revision as of 06:36, 6 December 2007

The Weil Conjectures

Definition

The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes :

  1. is flat and unramified.
  2. is flat and the sheaf of Kähler differentials is zero; .
  3. is smooth of relative dimension 0.

The small étale site

The category of étale -schemes becomes a Grothendieck topology, if one defines the sets of coverings to be jointly-surjective collections of -morphisms ; i.e., such that the union of images covers . That this forms a grothendieck essentially follows from the following three facts:

  1. Open immersions are étale.
  2. The étale property lifts by base change: that is, if is an étale morphism, and is any morphism, then the canonical fibered projection is again étale.
  3. If and are such that is étale, then is étale as well.

Étale cohomology

One begins by defining a presheaf to be a contravariant functor from the underlying category of a small étale site into an abelian category . A sheaf on is then

Applications

Deligne proved the Weil-Riemann hypothesis using étale cohomology.

-adic cohomology