Étale morphism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (moved Applications to the top to give the general reader at least *some* idea of what this is used for; also moved TOC to upper right) |
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo (The section heading "applications" is not to be understood in the colloquial sense; it refers to applications of the cohomology theory.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC-right}} | {{TOC-right}} | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
Line 32: | Line 27: | ||
==<math>l</math>-adic cohomology== | ==<math>l</math>-adic cohomology== | ||
==Applications== | |||
Deligne proved the [[Weil-Riemann hypothesis]] using étale cohomology. |
Revision as of 16:24, 3 January 2008
Definition
The following conditions are equivalent for a morphism of schemes :
- is flat and unramified.
- is flat and the sheaf of Kähler differentials is zero; .
- is smooth of relative dimension 0.
and is said to be étale when this is the case.
The small étale site
The category of étale -schemes becomes a Grothendieck topology, if one defines the sets of coverings to be jointly-surjective collections of -morphisms ; i.e., such that the union of images covers . That this forms a grothendieck essentially follows from the following three facts:
- Open immersions are étale.
- The étale property lifts by base change: that is, if is an étale morphism, and is any morphism, then the canonical fibered projection is again étale.
- If and are such that is étale, then is étale as well.
Étale cohomology
One begins by defining a presheaf to be a contravariant functor from the underlying category of a small étale site into an abelian category . Am étale sheaf (or just sheaf if the étale site is implicit) on is then a presheaf such that for all coverings , the diagram is exact.
-adic cohomology
Applications
Deligne proved the Weil-Riemann hypothesis using étale cohomology.