Talk:Moment of a force: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick m (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>John R. Brews (→Force + couple: new section) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
Could someone please take a look at this sentence: | |||
"However, being two distinct and separate physical concepts the units are always written as newton metres and never as joules." | |||
I think this needs work to make sense, but being unfamiliar with the overall concept I'd rather someone take a look and see if I'm right. | |||
For example, does the following make sense? | |||
"However, because newton metres and joules are distinct and separate physical concepts, newton metres is always used when referring to moment of force." | |||
[[User:David H. Barrett|David H. Barrett]] 00:21, 21 August 2008 (CDT) | |||
== Force + couple == | |||
This image was created by myself for WP and I have imported it here. The associated discussion was added to WP by myself under these edits:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Couple_%28mechanics%29&diff=379446108&oldid=369374789 1] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Couple_%28mechanics%29&diff=379581016&oldid=379448099 2]. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:50, 25 December 2010
Could someone please take a look at this sentence:
"However, being two distinct and separate physical concepts the units are always written as newton metres and never as joules."
I think this needs work to make sense, but being unfamiliar with the overall concept I'd rather someone take a look and see if I'm right.
For example, does the following make sense?
"However, because newton metres and joules are distinct and separate physical concepts, newton metres is always used when referring to moment of force."
David H. Barrett 00:21, 21 August 2008 (CDT)
Force + couple
This image was created by myself for WP and I have imported it here. The associated discussion was added to WP by myself under these edits:1 2. John R. Brews 14:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Engineering Underlinked Articles