Prime ends: Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Volk No edit summary |
imported>David E. Volk No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
In this way, a point in the boundary may correspond to many points in the prime ends of B, and conversely, many points in the boundary may correspond to a point in the prime ends of B. (for more precise definition of "chains of arc" and their equivalent classes see the references). | In this way, a point in the boundary may correspond to many points in the prime ends of B, and conversely, many points in the boundary may correspond to a point in the prime ends of B. (for more precise definition of "chains of arc" and their equivalent classes see the references). | ||
The expository paper of Epstein provides a good account of this theory with complete proofs. It also introduces a definition which make sense any open set in and dimension | The expository paper of Epstein provides a good account of this theory with complete proofs. It also introduces a definition which make sense any open set in and dimension. | ||
Revision as of 14:51, 23 December 2007
The prime end compactification is a method to compactify a topological disc (i.e. a simply connected open set in the plane) by adding a circle in an appropriate way.
The concept of prime end was introduced by Carathéodory to describe the boundary behavior of conformal maps in the complex plane in geometric terms. The theory has been generalized to more general open sets, too.
Carathéodory's principal theorem on the correspondence between boundaries under conformal mappings can expressed as follows:
If f maps the unit conformally and one-to-one onto the domain B, it induces a one-to-one mapping between the points on the unit circle and the prime ends of B.
The set of prime ends of the domain B is the set of equivalent classes of chains of arcs converging to a point on the boundary of B. In this way, a point in the boundary may correspond to many points in the prime ends of B, and conversely, many points in the boundary may correspond to a point in the prime ends of B. (for more precise definition of "chains of arc" and their equivalent classes see the references).
The expository paper of Epstein provides a good account of this theory with complete proofs. It also introduces a definition which make sense any open set in and dimension.