Talk:Magic (anthropology): Difference between revisions
imported>Aladin (more jeff sheridan) |
imported>Aladin (→Pointers for expanding/adding to the article: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Around 2003/4 I was filming a documentary for National Geographic TV during which they followed me to my first encounter with Jeff. He and I sat and quite spontaneously and eagerly began talking critical theory as it applied to magic as a performing art. It struck us during that meeting that there was a relative lacuna in terms of ruminative, anthropologically based discourse about conjuring epistemology, methodology and critical theory. We have since talked about collaborating on some text together. Meanwhile in the finished documentary National Geographic showed me sitting down and chatting with Doris Lessing, but not with Jeff Sheridan. At least he and I acquired a friendship at the end. aladin [[User:Aladin|Aladin]] 06:53, 14 November 2007 (CST) | Around 2003/4 I was filming a documentary for National Geographic TV during which they followed me to my first encounter with Jeff. He and I sat and quite spontaneously and eagerly began talking critical theory as it applied to magic as a performing art. It struck us during that meeting that there was a relative lacuna in terms of ruminative, anthropologically based discourse about conjuring epistemology, methodology and critical theory. We have since talked about collaborating on some text together. Meanwhile in the finished documentary National Geographic showed me sitting down and chatting with Doris Lessing, but not with Jeff Sheridan. At least he and I acquired a friendship at the end. aladin [[User:Aladin|Aladin]] 06:53, 14 November 2007 (CST) | ||
== Pointers for expanding/adding to the article == | |||
I would gently suggest that contributions should initially take place on the discussion pages, that these need to be alert to ethnocentricity [there is a world beyond Dover etc!], and that we take an academic if integrative approach to building the knowledge base. Citizendium is NOT a place to build fan pages, create publicity or act with disproportion; it is a true encylopaedia in Larry Sanger's vision and ANY and ALL material making its way onto the article page itself must be editorially cogent and salient - which other than with obvious exceptions needs to be established on the discussion pages. | |||
Many thanks. aladin [[User:Aladin|Aladin]] 07:00, 14 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 07:00, 14 November 2007
Contemporary definitions of conjuring, magic and illusion
Jeff Sheridan's contribution to conjuring epistemology are worthy of including in the main article. I will return to complete shortly. Aladin 17:43, 12 November 2007 (CST)
I have expanded the article with the inclusion of the relevant quotes from Helen Varola's 'Con Art'.
Around 2003/4 I was filming a documentary for National Geographic TV during which they followed me to my first encounter with Jeff. He and I sat and quite spontaneously and eagerly began talking critical theory as it applied to magic as a performing art. It struck us during that meeting that there was a relative lacuna in terms of ruminative, anthropologically based discourse about conjuring epistemology, methodology and critical theory. We have since talked about collaborating on some text together. Meanwhile in the finished documentary National Geographic showed me sitting down and chatting with Doris Lessing, but not with Jeff Sheridan. At least he and I acquired a friendship at the end. aladin Aladin 06:53, 14 November 2007 (CST)
Pointers for expanding/adding to the article
I would gently suggest that contributions should initially take place on the discussion pages, that these need to be alert to ethnocentricity [there is a world beyond Dover etc!], and that we take an academic if integrative approach to building the knowledge base. Citizendium is NOT a place to build fan pages, create publicity or act with disproportion; it is a true encylopaedia in Larry Sanger's vision and ANY and ALL material making its way onto the article page itself must be editorially cogent and salient - which other than with obvious exceptions needs to be established on the discussion pages.
Many thanks. aladin Aladin 07:00, 14 November 2007 (CST)