CZ Talk:The Editor Role: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Creating an encyclopedia is complicated; still, we'll keep this editor introduction brief but helpful. You can explore the links provided to get more in-depth information.
Done.  Editors, you know your own role better than I do, probably.  ''Please'' feel free to edit this in accordance with common CZ editor experience and practice.  Just, please, keep it coherent, brief, and maximally helpful. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:21, 12 September 2007 (CDT)


== Not your usual editorship ==
==Changes==
 
Apart from adding the Charter elements, I've trimmed this slightly, and altered it to make it clear that the role of an editor is not as demanding as it appeared before. Most importantly, I've removed the implication that Editors must be on mailing lists - if they want that level of involvement fine, but if they want to contribute occasionally, fine too, and if they don't want their mail boxes cluttered - well I can appreciate that.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 16:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Your role as ''Citizendium'' editor may not be what you might expect.  Why do we say that?
 
This is a wiki, first of all.  For that reason, it is very different from most publishing projects you might have been involved with.  It is run almost exclusively by volunteers, articles aren't signed, and everyone works side-by-side.  Maybe most importantly, everyone may improve any article at will: there is no central authority assigning work.  This may sound like anarchy, but it isn't.  Your presence as an editor is one reason that it isn't--it's a living, breathing online polity.  We hope you'll give this a try, because as a publishing model, it's extremely powerful.
 
Creating a "Citizens' Compendium" is actually a lot of fun, and it can be very rewarding--not to mention very helpful for a global audience.  We're doing something that could both greatly improve information online and serve as an example of a better sort of wiki project.
 
Considering all this, editorship in the ''Citizendium'' differs greatly from traditional editorship.  You neither assign work, nor is work assigned specifically to you.  Rather, your role is one of gentle oversight--village elders wandering the bazaar.  (See Eric Raymond's "<span class=plainlinks>[http://catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ The Cathedral and the Bazaar]</span>.")
 
== How to get involved ==
 
Here's how to be a ''Citizendium'' editor.
 
;1. REGISTER.
:First, of course, you need to [[CZ:Register|sign up]].  Once you have an account, however, you might not hear back from anybody if you do nothing. You need to take the next steps.
 
;2. SIGN UP FOR MAILING LISTS.
:If you don't sign up for mailing lists, you'll essentially be "out of the loop."  ''Citizendium'' mailing lists are generally low-volume ''announcement'' lists.  They aren't usually filled with a lot of talk.  We tend to do our discussion on the <span class=plainlinks>[http://forum.citizendium.org Forums]</span> instead.
 
[sign up for mailing list - respond to help requests]
 
[review recent changes in your area]
 
 
I guess the thing I am most unclear about at this point is the steps in the approval process of completed articles, who is expected to initiate what, who must sign off on an article before it is approved, and what the role of editors in that process is.
 
 
1. How do I get other authors/editors interested in contributing to a topic that I have started but will require further help for taking to the "Approved" article standard? 2. Often identifying other authors/editors from the relevant Workgroups, and inviting through  their User Talk pages cannot generate sufficient interest. 3. How to ensure that the [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Requested_Articles] be initiated by someone (except the requester)?
 
1) How does being an editor differ from being an author?
 
 
2) When does one's role as an editor 'kick in' in order to help the smooth functioning of CZ? ie, when does one 'switch' from fellow-author mode to editor mode and how does one best handle that? (may be no single answer of course).
 
 
3) What is an editor to do (practical tips especially welcome - perhaps me and my fellow editors are best placed to add to that too from our own personal practical experience over time) to ensure conflicts are minimised so that otherwise valuable contributors understand why a content decision might not have 'gone their way' yet still remain supportive contributors to the CZ project?
 
 
4) In practical terms, how is an editor expected to operate? For example, in my case, I intend to keep a look on issues related to gay marketing related topics so how might I best know that I am tracking articles relevant to my role.

Latest revision as of 10:40, 15 November 2010

Done. Editors, you know your own role better than I do, probably. Please feel free to edit this in accordance with common CZ editor experience and practice. Just, please, keep it coherent, brief, and maximally helpful. --Larry Sanger 14:21, 12 September 2007 (CDT)

Changes

Apart from adding the Charter elements, I've trimmed this slightly, and altered it to make it clear that the role of an editor is not as demanding as it appeared before. Most importantly, I've removed the implication that Editors must be on mailing lists - if they want that level of involvement fine, but if they want to contribute occasionally, fine too, and if they don't want their mail boxes cluttered - well I can appreciate that.Gareth Leng 16:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=CZ_Talk:The_Editor_Role&oldid=33345"