User talk:Regina Bouillon: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
imported>Denis Cavanagh
Line 59: Line 59:


:Denis, when you say, "It still needs work though," do you mean we should not approve it now or do you mean we should approve and then keep working on the draft?  If it's good enough to approve now, we should get it approved and then keep working on the draft for version 2.0. —[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 21:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
:Denis, when you say, "It still needs work though," do you mean we should not approve it now or do you mean we should approve and then keep working on the draft?  If it's good enough to approve now, we should get it approved and then keep working on the draft for version 2.0. —[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 21:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Yeah your right. I should add the disclaimer that I think everything needs more work. I'm a lazy perfectionist (In that I'm not a perfectionist :-) [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 21:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:11, 31 March 2009

Hi Regina!

I see you added Odambea on 7th November! You should add yourself to the list of revelers over at CZ:Monthly Write-a-Thon. I'm going to have to remember your name and make sure I invite you over in December! Aleta Curry 21:45, 8 November 2007 (CST)

Welcome and thanks

I'm just spending some time this morning thanking the newer/returned people who have been doing work on the wiki lately. So, thanks, nice to have you here! --Larry Sanger 09:39, 17 November 2007 (CST)

GNU self-authored image upload

It's quicker and easier with less to fill in at http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Special:Upload&uselang=ownworkgnu than at Special:Upload. Stephen Ewen 22:34, 28 November 2007 (CST)

Don't forget the December party!

Hi Regina! Your friendly neighbourhood Mistress of Ceremonies here, reminding you about the December write-a-thon! Please drop by and add yourself to the list of partiers--or non party-goers--as the case may be. You can leave a comment, question or excuse there, too--or talk to me Aleta Curry 03:27, 5 December 2007 (CST)

Re-visit please

Hi Regina. Just a note to say you forgot to license Image:Werner_gutzeit.JPG. You might want to revisit there a moment. Thanks, Stephen Ewen 22:14, 7 December 2007 (CST)

Hi!

Hi Regina--good to see you at the party! Aleta Curry 17:18, 9 January 2008 (CST)

Party! You're invited!

Hi Regina, the madness is back: Yes, it’s a new month, and here’s your friendly reminder that the FEBRUARY PARTY is on, and we’d love to see you there! It’s a very long day, so you have many hours yet to join in the madness fun. Aleta Curry 21:38, 5 February 2008 (CST)

There's a party going on...

...and when you Euro kids wake, Regina, it'll be Wednesday.

So join us!

It should be our usual madcap affair.

This month, our special theme is "Something you absolutely love".

Be there or be square!

Aleta Curry 15:50, 4 March 2008 (CST)

Haven't seen you about for a bit--party!

Hi Regina! Just me with my monthly reminder: Don’t forget the September party! Aleta Curry 20:48, 2 September 2008 (CDT)

possible article approval

Hi Regina, are you still around? Denis Cavanagh mentioned that he thinks that the article Russian Revolution of 1917 might be ready for approval. I took a look through the profiles for some of our history editors and it seems like you would be a good person to oversee approval for that article. What do you think? --Joe Quick 02:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Still around and back again

Hi Joe, I've just come back from a project in Ghana and will need a few days to go through my emails. Within the next week, I'll have a look at the article. Regina Bouillon

Great, thanks! --Joe Quick 18:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for the approval. It still needs work though. Thought I should just mention that I used Sheila Fitzpatrick rather heavily, a rather unconventional textbook but probably OK. Thanks again and let me know if there is anything else I can do! Denis Cavanagh 07:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Denis, when you say, "It still needs work though," do you mean we should not approve it now or do you mean we should approve and then keep working on the draft? If it's good enough to approve now, we should get it approved and then keep working on the draft for version 2.0. —Joe Quick 21:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah your right. I should add the disclaimer that I think everything needs more work. I'm a lazy perfectionist (In that I'm not a perfectionist :-) Denis Cavanagh 21:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)