Talk:Competition policy/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis No edit summary |
imported>D. Matt Innis No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::No, it's a practical question from someone who doesnt know the technical problems we have. Better to keep away, Nick:-) --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 16:39, 13 November 2007 (CST) | ::No, it's a practical question from someone who doesnt know the technical problems we have. Better to keep away, Nick:-) --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 16:39, 13 November 2007 (CST) | ||
==APPROVED Version 1.0== <div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title= | ==APPROVED Version 1.0== | ||
Congratulations again Nick et al!<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Competition_policy&oldid=100210726 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div> |
Revision as of 20:16, 21 November 2007
Fixed, I think? --Robert W King 16:27, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- It still doesnt appear in the To Approve listings:-((( --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:29, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- Link for me the "To Approve" listings. --Robert W King 16:36, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- It still doesnt appear in the To Approve listings:-((( --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:29, 13 November 2007 (CST)
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Category:Articles_to_Approve But you can also check from the Workgroup pages, section ToApprove. Martin
- Moved to the talk page of that category. --Robert W King 16:43, 13 November 2007 (CST)
What does Robert King mean? Nick Gardner 16:33, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- Is this a philosophical, existential, or abstract question? --Robert W King 16:37, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- No, it's a practical question from someone who doesnt know the technical problems we have. Better to keep away, Nick:-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:39, 13 November 2007 (CST)
APPROVED Version 1.0
Congratulations again Nick et al!