Talk:Binomial theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Jitse Niesen (→popular culture: "I agree, so I'll delete it in a minute.") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] | [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] | ||
==popular culture== | |||
Can we get rid of the '''In popular culture''' section? It adds nothing to anyone's understanding of the binomial theorem. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 11:02, 15 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
:I agree, so I'll delete it in a minute. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 16:22, 15 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:22, 15 July 2008
status is really about 2.5 - 2 for the elementary binomial theorem/formula, and 3 for the Newtonian. Anthony Argyriou 17:23, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
While the definition is strictly true, it seems written backwards, in that if you actually do
the sum for (x+y)^2 the answer you get as the equation is written is y^2 + 2xy + x^2. Of course you can rearrange
to get x^2 + 2xy + y^2. Another way to write it would be
x^(n-k)y^(k), in which case you directly get the answers as shown in the examples.
popular culture
Can we get rid of the In popular culture section? It adds nothing to anyone's understanding of the binomial theorem. Anthony Argyriou 11:02, 15 July 2008 (CDT)
- I agree, so I'll delete it in a minute. -- Jitse Niesen 16:22, 15 July 2008 (CDT)