Talk:Clebsch-Gordan coefficients: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer (→Confusement: new section) |
imported>Jitse Niesen (notation of eigenstates) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In the original WP text the ''i'' in ''j''<sub> ''i''</sub> could stand for ''x'', ''y'', or ''z'', or for "particle number" 1 or 2. In some situations this was confusing, so I introduced ''x'', ''y'' and ''z''.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:32, 7 October 2007 (CDT) | In the original WP text the ''i'' in ''j''<sub> ''i''</sub> could stand for ''x'', ''y'', or ''z'', or for "particle number" 1 or 2. In some situations this was confusing, so I introduced ''x'', ''y'' and ''z''.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:32, 7 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Notation of eigenstates == | |||
Is there a difference between the states <math>|(j_1j_2)JM\rangle</math> and <math>|JM\rangle</math>? I guess not, because the latter notation appears in the orthogonality relation | |||
:<math> | |||
\langle J M | J' M' \rangle = \delta_{J\, J'}\delta_{M\,M'} | |||
</math> | |||
without any comment. I find it rather confusing that both notations appear in the definition | |||
:<math> | |||
|(j_1j_2)JM\rangle = \sum_{m_1=-j_1}^{j_1} \sum_{m_2=-j_2}^{j_2} | |||
|j_1m_1\rangle|j_2m_2\rangle \langle j_1m_1j_2m_2|JM\rangle | |||
</math> | |||
for the CG coeffs. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 06:37, 30 July 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 05:37, 30 July 2008
From Wikipedia, I changed the lead, added equation for explicit expression (plus discussion) and one special case.--Paul Wormer 03:45, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
Confusement
In the original WP text the i in j i could stand for x, y, or z, or for "particle number" 1 or 2. In some situations this was confusing, so I introduced x, y and z.--Paul Wormer 07:32, 7 October 2007 (CDT)
Notation of eigenstates
Is there a difference between the states and ? I guess not, because the latter notation appears in the orthogonality relation
without any comment. I find it rather confusing that both notations appear in the definition
for the CG coeffs. -- Jitse Niesen 06:37, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles