Talk:Barack Obama/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen mNo edit summary |
imported>Stephen Ewen mNo edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100248705&oldid=100246914 | #http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100248705&oldid=100246914 | ||
On what Larry stated I could do, what I' | On what Larry stated I could do, what I'm choosing is, "[[CZ:Professionalism#Reversion_and_deletion_as_unprofessional_behaviors|sometimes the polite way is to let the other person undo his or her own work, once a mistake is pointed out.]]" | ||
[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 22:22, 10 January 2008 (CST) | [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 22:22, 10 January 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 23:24, 10 January 2008
This is an attempt to write an article on this candidate, Barack Obama. It attempts to be a biography, not a day to day account of his campaign, nor a campaign advertisement. Disclosure: I am a US citizen. I am not registered to either party as a voter. Larry Yount 21:58, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
Steve has complained (privately) that Richard reverted his edits without explanation. I agree that that is simply unacceptable, particularly in light of recent discussions. Well, as a very imperfect stopgap measure, here's what I've decided: Steve, feel free to redo your edits, if you want. Then, Richard may not touch them; others will have to do so, if they are flawed. If he does edit them, then tell me, and I will ban him from working on this article. --Larry Sanger 21:34, 10 January 2008 (CST)
- Steve was the one who changed my edits. with, as you can see, no explanation on the talk page.Richard Jensen 21:48, 10 January 2008 (CST)
The facts are here:
- http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100246909&oldid=100246908
- http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100246910&oldid=100246909
- http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100248705&oldid=100246914
On what Larry stated I could do, what I'm choosing is, "sometimes the polite way is to let the other person undo his or her own work, once a mistake is pointed out."
Stephen Ewen 22:22, 10 January 2008 (CST)