Talk:Unertan Syndrome: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>James A. Flippin (→Needs some work: How does TI workgroup work?) |
imported>D. Matt Innis |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::It certainly needs to be heavily edited by someone not associated with it, I agree, though Dr. Tan would certainly be the reasonable source for the information. That is why the Topic Informant workgroup is involved. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 09:53, 27 June 2007 (CDT) | ::It certainly needs to be heavily edited by someone not associated with it, I agree, though Dr. Tan would certainly be the reasonable source for the information. That is why the Topic Informant workgroup is involved. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 09:53, 27 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::I see. I guess I don't quite understand how the whole TI workgroup thing works. I thought the idea was to have the TI provide information in a separate space, but never actually write the article, and at this point he's written the whole thing. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 10:29, 27 June 2007 (CDT) | :::I see. I guess I don't quite understand how the whole TI workgroup thing works. I thought the idea was to have the TI provide information in a separate space, but never actually write the article, and at this point he's written the whole thing. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 10:29, 27 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::::We are in unchartered territory, but probably more of a content issue. I suppose, as a matter of neutrality, the article could be moved to his userspace, though it is already moved to [[TI:Unertan Syndrome]]. This way he can work on it in his own time to bring it in line with [[CZ:Article Mechanics]], or an interested party could start here. I am not sure that anyone else is aware of the subject matter and it would take some research on their part. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 11:03, 27 June 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:03, 27 June 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Health Sciences Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Matt Innis (Talk) 09:01, 27 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Needs some work
This article needs some work to make it read as an encyclopedic entry on the topic rather than primary source research by the author. --Matt Innis (Talk) 09:06, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
- Shouldn't it be written by someone who didn't discover and name the disease? James A. Flippin 09:04, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
- It certainly needs to be heavily edited by someone not associated with it, I agree, though Dr. Tan would certainly be the reasonable source for the information. That is why the Topic Informant workgroup is involved. --Matt Innis (Talk) 09:53, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
- I see. I guess I don't quite understand how the whole TI workgroup thing works. I thought the idea was to have the TI provide information in a separate space, but never actually write the article, and at this point he's written the whole thing. James A. Flippin 10:29, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
- We are in unchartered territory, but probably more of a content issue. I suppose, as a matter of neutrality, the article could be moved to his userspace, though it is already moved to TI:Unertan Syndrome. This way he can work on it in his own time to bring it in line with CZ:Article Mechanics, or an interested party could start here. I am not sure that anyone else is aware of the subject matter and it would take some research on their part. --Matt Innis (Talk) 11:03, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
- I see. I guess I don't quite understand how the whole TI workgroup thing works. I thought the idea was to have the TI provide information in a separate space, but never actually write the article, and at this point he's written the whole thing. James A. Flippin 10:29, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
- It certainly needs to be heavily edited by someone not associated with it, I agree, though Dr. Tan would certainly be the reasonable source for the information. That is why the Topic Informant workgroup is involved. --Matt Innis (Talk) 09:53, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Health Sciences Category Check
- General Category Check
- Topic Informant Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Topic Informant Advanced Articles
- Topic Informant Nonstub Articles
- Topic Informant Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Topic Informant Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Topic Informant Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- Topic Informant Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Health Sciences External Articles
- Topic Informant External Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Topic Informant Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Topic Informant Cleanup
- Cleanup