Talk:Pedophilia: Difference between revisions
imported>Mike Mayors |
imported>Mike Mayors |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The article on WP caused a whole lot of controversy, the authors for this article on CZ needs to be careful. Now WP has an unwritten rule to block any users who self-identify as pedophile, I don't think CZ need that rule, but we need to write neutrally. [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 09:24, 10 June 2007 (CDT) | The article on WP caused a whole lot of controversy, the authors for this article on CZ needs to be careful. Now WP has an unwritten rule to block any users who self-identify as pedophile, I don't think CZ need that rule, but we need to write neutrally. [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 09:24, 10 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
Yep, I completely agree. I think as long as we focus on the paraphilia itself, and not the actions associated with it (i.e. child sexual abuse), we shouldn't have much of a problem. If anyone can find credible research, please feel free to post it below. | Yep, I completely agree. I think as long as we focus on the paraphilia itself, and not the actions associated with it (i.e. child sexual abuse), we shouldn't have much of a problem. If anyone can find credible research, please feel free to post it below. [[User:Mike Mayors|Mike Mayors]] [[User talk:Mike Mayors|(Talk)]] 09:32, 10 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Pedophilia Research== | ==Pedophilia Research== | ||
Revision as of 08:32, 10 June 2007
Mike- are you quoting? If so- put in the quotation marks and give your references. Put the references down as you read the ones I sent you under References, please. Thanks, Nancy Sculerati 14:25, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
- Actually I just know that from doing online reading - but sure, I'll provide the reference you sent to me. Thanks. Mike Mayors (Talk) 14:35, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
Citing sources?
I'm not sure how to cite it properly. When someone gets a chance, can you check/correct my citation in the introduction? Mike Mayors (Talk) 14:38, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
controversial subject
The article on WP caused a whole lot of controversy, the authors for this article on CZ needs to be careful. Now WP has an unwritten rule to block any users who self-identify as pedophile, I don't think CZ need that rule, but we need to write neutrally. Yi Zhe Wu 09:24, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
Yep, I completely agree. I think as long as we focus on the paraphilia itself, and not the actions associated with it (i.e. child sexual abuse), we shouldn't have much of a problem. If anyone can find credible research, please feel free to post it below. Mike Mayors (Talk) 09:32, 10 June 2007 (CDT)