Talk:Social security: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards m (Talk:Social Security moved to Talk:Social security) |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I will put something here in the next days. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 08:43, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | I will put something here in the next days. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 08:43, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Discussion of popular perception of the welfare state == | |||
It is perfectly correct to characterise the historical and popular perception [hence general perception] of the w.s. in anglophone countries as carrying stigma. This is the consensus of the academic literature, and is also consistent with any contemporary examination of press reports using the phrase. This is despite the fact that the UK moved to a more Scandinavian approach after WW II: this had a very short period of legitimacy in historical terms, which has now disappeared. Individual social policy programmes have varying degrees of popular support and probably much more should be written here about that. For the moment, I leave it as a brief comment on the perception of the phrase "welfare state". --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 11:36, 29 September 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:36, 29 September 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Economics Workgroup, Sociology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Versuri 08:20, 13 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This empty page needs something quickly in order to avoid deleting it for the time being. --Matt Innis (Talk) 07:30, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
I will put something here in the next days. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 08:43, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
Discussion of popular perception of the welfare state
It is perfectly correct to characterise the historical and popular perception [hence general perception] of the w.s. in anglophone countries as carrying stigma. This is the consensus of the academic literature, and is also consistent with any contemporary examination of press reports using the phrase. This is despite the fact that the UK moved to a more Scandinavian approach after WW II: this had a very short period of legitimacy in historical terms, which has now disappeared. Individual social policy programmes have varying degrees of popular support and probably much more should be written here about that. For the moment, I leave it as a brief comment on the perception of the phrase "welfare state". --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 11:36, 29 September 2007 (CDT)
- Economics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Sociology Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Sociology Advanced Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Economics Developed Articles
- Sociology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Sociology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Economics Stub Articles
- Sociology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Economics External Articles
- Sociology External Articles
- Economics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Sociology Underlinked Articles
- Economics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Sociology Cleanup
- Cleanup