CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0001: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
imported>Larry Sanger
Line 19: Line 19:
== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==


* [http://mail.citizendium.org/pipermail/cz-editcouncil/2007-May/000085.html ''Initial'' comments from Council Members]
* [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,890.0.html Forums board for Resolution 0001:] this is for discussion of the resolution open to all project participants.
* [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,890.0.html Forums board for Resolution 0001:] this is for discussion of the resolution open to all project participants.
* [[CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0001/Member position statements|Member position statements]]
* [[CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0001/Member position statements|Member position statements]]

Revision as of 17:52, 2 May 2007

The resolution

Whereas, The Citizendium Editorial Council is in need of a method of decisionmaking that is fair, wise, and efficient;

Resolved, That the Council adopts the document "Editorial Council Rules of Procedure," as its rules of procedure.

Method of execution

The Council will immediately begin using the rules upon adoption.

Amendments

There have been no amendments.

Current status

Initial call for (silent) comment. Member comments due, privately, to the Chair, May 2, Noon Eastern time, 5 PM UTC.

Discussion

Sponsors

Before it is added to the Agenda, these sponsors, but only these sponsors, may edit the text of the resolution. After it is added to the Agenda, it cannot be edited by anyone except via the amendment process.

Resolution history

  • Proposed: May 1, 2007
  • Entered queue: May 1, 2007
  • Entered initial discussion: May 1, 2007
  • Entered public discussion: Noon Eastern, May 2, 2007
  • Scheduled close of commentary: Saturday, May 5, 2007, 12 PM EST/5 PM UTC
  • Entered voting:
  • Voting deadline:


Template:Editcouncil