User talk:Robert Tito: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Hayford Peirce (ID) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
I created a template for a periodic table element on the talk page of [[Talk:Periodic_Table_of_the_Elements]]. Let me know what you think.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 15:16, 23 May 2007 (CDT) | I created a template for a periodic table element on the talk page of [[Talk:Periodic_Table_of_the_Elements]]. Let me know what you think.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 15:16, 23 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
==ID== | |||
I agree that ID means lotsa other things. But so far as I can tell, there is a lot of energy being devoted here in CZ to Intelligent Design, and they are calling it ID throughout. In Wikipedia they have something called disambiguity, if I recall, that lists various things such as "Big Three" or common names such as "Jack Crawford", in an article, with descriptions and links to the relevant one. I'm sure that the same will happen here in CZ if it hangs around long enough.... Cheers! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 23:38, 24 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:38, 24 May 2007
See
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User_talk:Stephen_Ewen&action=history
question
Hi Robert! I have a question. At wikipedia, I have grown used to the popups script. (by User:Lupin). Is it ported to Citizendium?--Anupam Srivastava 17:18, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
- Anupam, actually no, but I am not certain about using them in the future. We are talking about them but no verdict yet. HTH, Robert Tito | Talk
- Ah... thanks for the information. For what its worth, popups is one of the best tools out there :D, especially for those who want to browse, not edit.
carbon in life
Hi, during a cleanup operation I came upon your old draft Robert_Tito/carbon_in_life. You know better its purpose and the right title/place :) --Aleksander Stos 06:48, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Decision Support
As you may have some interest in it, please have a look at Clinical decision support system and, if possible, lend a helping hand in editing that. Supten 22:33, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
Unprotecting Talk:Logical positivism
Would it be safe to unprotect Talk:Logical positivism yet? It's in a block of articles I signed up for for the Big Cleanup and it needs a checklist. Petréa Mitchell 13:00, 20 May 2007 (CDT) Petréa, it is unprotected. Robert Tito | Talk
Talk:Periodic Table
Mr Tito-
I created a template for a periodic table element on the talk page of Talk:Periodic_Table_of_the_Elements. Let me know what you think.--Robert W King 15:16, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
ID
I agree that ID means lotsa other things. But so far as I can tell, there is a lot of energy being devoted here in CZ to Intelligent Design, and they are calling it ID throughout. In Wikipedia they have something called disambiguity, if I recall, that lists various things such as "Big Three" or common names such as "Jack Crawford", in an article, with descriptions and links to the relevant one. I'm sure that the same will happen here in CZ if it hangs around long enough.... Cheers! Hayford Peirce 23:38, 24 May 2007 (CDT)