Talk:K3 surface: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Holger Kley No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
I think abelian surfaces have an equally good (if not better) claim to being 2-dimensional analogs of elliptic curves and would change the first sentence of the article to reflect that. | I think abelian surfaces have an equally good (if not better) claim to being 2-dimensional analogs of elliptic curves and would change the first sentence of the article to reflect that. | ||
[[User:Holger Kley|Holger Kley]] 11:33, 8 July 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Holger Kley|Holger Kley]] 11:33, 8 July 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 02:21, 4 November 2007
I think abelian surfaces have an equally good (if not better) claim to being 2-dimensional analogs of elliptic curves and would change the first sentence of the article to reflect that. Holger Kley 11:33, 8 July 2007 (CDT)