Talk:Group (mathematics): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jared Grubb (reply) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (removed an old delete request -- the article has been cleaned up and edited quite a bit since then) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
It was edited only once (long ago), minor rewording of no big importance, no intent of further developing. --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 16:01, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | It was edited only once (long ago), minor rewording of no big importance, no intent of further developing. --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 16:01, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
| Line 20: | Line 8: | ||
:: Is there any reason to delete the history? Does CZ wish to keep their histories as WP-free as well? I'm still learning the concept of CZ here, so I'm not sure what to say. I'm indifferent either way. - [[User:Jared Grubb|Jared Grubb]] 11:18, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | :: Is there any reason to delete the history? Does CZ wish to keep their histories as WP-free as well? I'm still learning the concept of CZ here, so I'm not sure what to say. I'm indifferent either way. - [[User:Jared Grubb|Jared Grubb]] 11:18, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
::: Well, I think the 'cleaner' solution would be to suppress everything to make sure we display our own work. But I guess we are not maniacs at this point. So if you blank the page with a clear edit summary e.g. "starting from scratch" or something, that would do the job -- perhaps it'd be faster if you want to start right now. --[[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 02:57, 4 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
:::: I'll just do that. I am currently working on [[Group theory]], but these two pages need to be created together so that they are harmonious and not competing for content. The difference between the pages is subtle. Thanks! - [[User:Jared Grubb|Jared Grubb]] 10:36, 4 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:39, 22 January 2009
It was edited only once (long ago), minor rewording of no big importance, no intent of further developing. --AlekStos 16:01, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
I've always hated the WP article and I would volunteer to start a new one from scratch. Delete this one. - Jared Grubb 08:16, 30 April 2007 (CDT)
- Jared, we have two options here. Get a Mathematics editor to sign of on your request to delete it, notify me, and it will be gone...along with, perhaps most importantly, its history. Or, just blank it and start again. Stephen Ewen 04:44, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
- Is there any reason to delete the history? Does CZ wish to keep their histories as WP-free as well? I'm still learning the concept of CZ here, so I'm not sure what to say. I'm indifferent either way. - Jared Grubb 11:18, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
- Well, I think the 'cleaner' solution would be to suppress everything to make sure we display our own work. But I guess we are not maniacs at this point. So if you blank the page with a clear edit summary e.g. "starting from scratch" or something, that would do the job -- perhaps it'd be faster if you want to start right now. --Aleksander Stos 02:57, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
- I'll just do that. I am currently working on Group theory, but these two pages need to be created together so that they are harmonious and not competing for content. The difference between the pages is subtle. Thanks! - Jared Grubb 10:36, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
- Well, I think the 'cleaner' solution would be to suppress everything to make sure we display our own work. But I guess we are not maniacs at this point. So if you blank the page with a clear edit summary e.g. "starting from scratch" or something, that would do the job -- perhaps it'd be faster if you want to start right now. --Aleksander Stos 02:57, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
- Is there any reason to delete the history? Does CZ wish to keep their histories as WP-free as well? I'm still learning the concept of CZ here, so I'm not sure what to say. I'm indifferent either way. - Jared Grubb 11:18, 3 May 2007 (CDT)