Talk:List of Fighting Fantasy publications: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling No edit summary |
imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling (Have moved content to a more suitable location (i.e. not an article page:-). Article can be deleted.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a list. Should be deleted. | This is a list. Should be deleted. | ||
:It was created earlier today, it will be expanded. —[[User:Joseph Rushton Wakeling|Joseph Rushton Wakeling]] 15:27, 15 February 2007 (CST) | :It was created earlier today, it will be expanded to more than just a list in time. —[[User:Joseph Rushton Wakeling|Joseph Rushton Wakeling]] 15:27, 15 February 2007 (CST) | ||
I have to disagree that lists should be deleted just because they are lists. If as I hope we jettison categories, lists will be necessary in ''some'' cases (not many). In this case, however, I have to agree. Such a list should be incorporated into the [[Fighting Fantasy]] article, I imagine. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:52, 15 February 2007 (CST) | |||
:OK. What's here is completely inadequate for now anyway. What's intended is the main [[Fighting Fantasy]] article gives an overview of the books, their history etc., and this article gives an overview of the different publication series. I'll see if I can work it into the main article, though. —[[User:Joseph Rushton Wakeling|Joseph Rushton Wakeling]] 17:17, 15 February 2007 (CST) | |||
::I've moved the content to a subpage of [[Talk:Fighting Fantasy]], where it can be useful just for keeping track of things. I'll wait until the main FF article is much more complete before deciding whether to use it there, or make a separate "publications" article. This article can now safely be deleted. —[[User:Joseph Rushton Wakeling|Joseph Rushton Wakeling]] 17:56, 15 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:56, 15 February 2007
This is a list. Should be deleted.
- It was created earlier today, it will be expanded to more than just a list in time. —Joseph Rushton Wakeling 15:27, 15 February 2007 (CST)
I have to disagree that lists should be deleted just because they are lists. If as I hope we jettison categories, lists will be necessary in some cases (not many). In this case, however, I have to agree. Such a list should be incorporated into the Fighting Fantasy article, I imagine. --Larry Sanger 16:52, 15 February 2007 (CST)
- OK. What's here is completely inadequate for now anyway. What's intended is the main Fighting Fantasy article gives an overview of the books, their history etc., and this article gives an overview of the different publication series. I'll see if I can work it into the main article, though. —Joseph Rushton Wakeling 17:17, 15 February 2007 (CST)
- I've moved the content to a subpage of Talk:Fighting Fantasy, where it can be useful just for keeping track of things. I'll wait until the main FF article is much more complete before deciding whether to use it there, or make a separate "publications" article. This article can now safely be deleted. —Joseph Rushton Wakeling 17:56, 15 February 2007 (CST)